A sincere gentleman sharing a magnet motor build .[NDA issues??]

[ramset]

Massive
Can you repost the link you mentioned to that Howard Johnson Video from his Home ?

I would appreciate that !

Thx

Chet

note
found it thx

Massive
Quote
Howard Johnson dedicated a large chunk of his life to magnet motor design and successfully got a patent.

"Energy from the vacuum part 4" DVD shows his linear motor and the possible thrust when designed correctly

http://www.energyfromthevacuum.com/Disc4HoJo/index.html

http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Howard_Johnson_Motor/1979Paper/

magnet motors are definitely a reality and achievable BUT .....itd take a super dedicated researcher or team


All the best of luck

[sm0ky2]

Let's see some credible evidence for these claims:I'll bet a cheezburger you won't be providing any.

And nothing in your post refutes my contention that the "sincere gentleman" did not have what he claimed to have (therefore his statements were false), or that there will be no self-running magnet motor coming from him or any of his erstwhile disciples (who mostly have already given up.)

you are probably right about this particular device, I see nothing "sincere" nor "shared" here...
Not because of any scientific "laws", but because he probably never had one fully working to begin with.


as far as the points I addressed earlier: I think you know how to calculate the pressure of a jet nozzle, with a known volume and height, aperture size, and able to calculate to what height the jet of water will fly. It's not rocket science (ok, maybe a little... but still not overly complicated).
at small volumes, the jet stream will be so thin, that no effective amount of water will be transferred.
with a large enough container, hose and nozzle designed to perform the task, the most complicated part about it is to aim the stream back into the box.
im pretty sure anyone can do it, we were just a handful of college kids that could barely write out the 3rd integral of a Feynman loop.

the whick-wheel, is irrefutably perpetual. Refuting this device must be done by talking to a tree.
A large Sequoia would work nice for this, as they have no muscular system to lift water. E=mg(how tall are those things?)

But these things are not an "impossible magnetic motor",
they are just examples of specific cases when our scientific equations result in anomalous energy values.

a sustainable magnetic interaction is not impossible, there are equations which define such cases.
There are other unknown magnetic conditions which have not been fully experimented with, or even yet conceived.
It just seems preposterous at this point for anyone to think such an impossibility exists.
Despite them not yet having observed the contrary.


When there are multiple fields interacting, things stray from the normal linear approach, and each dipole interaction must be treated as an asymmetrical field gradient.
(Similar to the way we broke down the steps in the Tri-Force gates).
Each set of magnetic interactions must be treated separately.
There are no boundaries to the flux loop from this perspective.
energy "in" and "out" has no contextual meaning.
Interacting forces over distance(work), irrespective of time.
Time relates the energy into some value, from our outside perspective, but it does not pertain to the actual energy values inside the system. These are discrete to the field interactions.
Sure we could calculate the force, at the distance, and plot the work function over the course of a cycle, graph the changes in acceleration, elasticity of the fields, etc. and try to relate this data to our "time".
But this is not the true energy.
In truth, there is no less energy in the field interactions of magnets,
than there is in the forces bounding an electron to its' nucleic orbit at nearly the speed of light.
Its the same energy, what we observe is an accumulation of the field effects resultant from the atomic interaction.
from a certain perspective, a magnet could be described as a nuclear battery.

is it "impossible" to run a motor with a battery? what if the motor WAS the battery?
how much energy is there? how long will it run?
well, luckily for us, Mad 'am Curie left us a hint we can relate back to Einstein's E=mc^2

We know from signal processing that interacting fields, in certain arrangements, can build up large energy values very quickly.
purely magnetic fields can behave in a similar manner. Our current technology uses a forceful technique.
we drive things, and force induce currents.
The types of things we are trying to build use the natural cycle of energy,
the magnets do the work for you, not the other way around.
the conditions that bound us, are our own construction flaws, and a trained 'eye' for complex magnetic fields.
we're getting better at the second one.

[massive]

I didnt even see TK post ...... NZ is 2 hrs ahead of OZ , I went to sleep .

with out doing web search , TK is right , by memory theres a jet pack guy  vs  squirel suit/chute guy  = 2 diff guys . 1 jumps from a plane , the other jumps off cliffs .

it always looks dodgie when some one mentions a NDA , it seems to be the key ingredient in stories now but apart from that , why post anything if one has genuinely signed any contract of any kind ?
are they testing the law ?

[sm0ky2]

it always looks dodgie when some one mentions a NDA , it seems to be the key ingredient in stories now but apart from that , why post anything if one has genuinely signed any contract of any kind ?
are they testing the law ?

I believe the original "NDA issues", were whether or not to have one with whoever the information was to be disclosed to.
Although now it would seem, there is a lack of a working prototype which to disclose...

[AlienGrey]

I believe the original "NDA issues", were whether or not to have one with whoever the information was to be disclosed to.
Although now it would seem, there is a lack of a working prototype which to disclose...

Yeah ! look if you have an NDA and you sign it they expect your personal info right well suppose the idea is just that your personal info, your then at risk if they dont like your thinking, i suppose .