World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

[gravityblock]

I have to disappoint you. There is still a battery in the circuit. It is even in the schema you posted yourself on the previous page. And it is in every single coherer schema you can find.


And the battery is there as a source of power. Definitely not to be recharged by by the coherer.[/size]
Try for example this: https://www.google.com/search?q=coherer+schema

Battery or no battery in the circuit is totally irrelevant.  It's already been clearly shown that the coherers can produce a DC current without the need for batteries.  Now, how are you going to store the DC current produced by the coherers in order to light an LED after a sufficient charge has been built up?  A battery of course, lol!

The schema I posted on the previous page with a battery in the circuit is to test the state of the memristors and coherers and has nothing to do with producing a DC current without a battery, lol.

Gravock

[txt]

I suppose you power your house with coherers, don't you?

[gravityblock]

I suppose you power your house with coherers, don't you?

Your comment above isn't a scientific or mathematical rebuttal.

Gravock

[txt]

... this may be one of the first rectifying (diode) detectors, because  Branly reported it could produce a DC current without a battery.  <----------Energy Harvesting

You misinterpreted the text again. The coherer does not make any energy harvesting at all. The tripod coherer is simply just a very primitive diode,
and hence it can convert the AC signal from an antenna to DC, just like the crystal in a crystal radio does, or like a Si diode does in modern circuits,
much more efficiently. It would be the utmost stupid idea to use a giant ineffective coherer instead of a microscopic and very efficient diode.

[Pirate88179]

Your comment above isn't a scientific or mathematical rebuttal.

Gravock

Are you saying he was not coherent?


(Sorry, I could not resist)


Bill