Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

Started by e2matrix, August 29, 2015, 09:01:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

skywatcher

Harvesting man-made EM energy would be no 'free energy' anyway, because someone paid for the energy which powers the transmitter, and the RF field is weakened by sucking energy out of it so the receiver will need more energy to maintain the same field strength.

txt

Quote from: tinman on February 27, 2016, 08:59:59 AMNo,the system was drawing 3mA @ .175 volt's--that was not the charging current.
If the system delivers 3mA @ 0.175V, it gives exactly 525μW, just as I wrote. So where is your higher charging power coming from, if not from the system? From another external battery? From the grid? From the Holy Ghost?

Quote from: Nink on February 27, 2016, 10:36:02 AM
@Tinman As usual you took the easy way out and resorted to actually building a circuit testing it and making a video proving something is possible,  when you could have focused on endless debates, conjecture and just making stuff up like everyone else here does.
I must be blind, but I saw no proof in that video that charging a battery in any interesting levels in average environment is possible. Did you? As I wrote, at the charging power of 525μW, you'd need two years (in the very best case) to recharge the 3 AA cells.

skywatcher

I have measured the voltage of the almost completely empty batteries:

#1: 1063 mV
#2: 1216 mV
#3: 800 mV, slowly increasing

txt

Nice! Now it might be interesting to open the batteries and compare them to common NiMH batteries. Not that I would expect anything else, but just to be sure. Note: you'll need some protective gear if you decide doing so.

skywatcher

Quote from: txt on February 28, 2016, 12:00:36 PM
Nice! Now it might be interesting to open the batteries and compare them to common NiMH batteries. Not that I would expect anything else, but just to be sure. Note: you'll need some protective gear if you decide doing so.

I don't expect any additional information from opening the batteries. I don't have a chemical lab to analyze the contents, and simply looking at it doesn't make much sense.
Additionally, in case they will offer a refund, this would not be possible after destroying anything.

Even if there would be anything special with the batteries, it might be impossible to detect this even by analyzing it chemically.
Example: If you would analyze p- and n-doped silicon you also would not recognize any difference, unless you precisely know for what you have to look.   ;)