Was the moon landing for real ???

[Freezer]

http://www.tass-survey.org/richmond/answers/lunar_lander.html

[hartiberlin]

Here is an interesting discussion of the first released Japanese
"low res" images from the moon:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread308517/pg1

I wonder, why the Japanese couldn?t getter higher res images yet ?

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Stefan and all,

I thought the reason for the poor picture quality was obvious. It cost too much to launch the satellite. There was not enough money left in the budget to buy a decent camera so a second hand Brownie had to do. :-)

Hans von Lieven

[hartiberlin]

Here are 4 pages full of photos,
that prove, that they astronauts were still
on the earth when these pics were taken...

http://www.fast-geheim.de/html/apollo.html

[devilzangel]

Harti, comon man,

If i think about this over and over as i did a few years ago, i realize that all this shadow and lighting evidence is not really definite proof. I did model experiments about this in high school; I found that their are too many variables that can explain the reason for the shadows being in slightly different angles. This is also explained very well in one recent documentary. They even do full scale experiments to show this. Terrain, wide angle, surface reflections, etc.

Maybe the modules did have artificial lighting, I would think thats the first thing they would put on the modules. I am also sure some images have been edited; obviously.

As for the flag waving; It is hard to say, but the best and definite way to prove it one way or another is to do an experiment in a vacuum chamber. Think about it, why would they allow such a video to become official public knowledge if they knew how objects react in vacuum? If it was a filmed footage on earth, they would simply make a flag that was rigid or do a retake!

devilzangel
..