Was the moon landing for real ???

[devilzangel]

  I cant tell if you r being sarcastic or not.

Anywho, all the proof I need to say that the first mission to the moon was faked is to simply look at the video link i posted. Its like a smoking gun.

devilzangel
..

[devilzangel]

Here is a very interesting video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9NWR5Dn6QI

1. it seems to show an object on the moon, which puts out some puff of
smoke stack or cloud..

2. This is from Apollo 8, where they just went around the
moon and did not land...

Look at the size of the earth and compare it with the actual
landing and moon photos of Apollo 9 and later missions !

There the earth is much smaller !
So the only conclusion is:
All the moon landing photos and videos are faked ba NASA.

Nice find Harti, BUT, the size of an object can be changed simply by changing a few camera settings as well as the distance between the module, moon and earth. One obvious is the zoom function. Another is wide angle or absence of it.

devilzangel
..

[acp]

@Koen 1,  You have to be kidding with building a moon base for two million, even a bridge or some such mundane structure here on earth often costs more than that.

@shruggedatlas

This just in, the space shuttle flights are a hoax.  Notice how there are NO STARS in this picture!!!!!

Of course the stars aren't shining, You aren't going to trick me with your conspiracy theories!!!! The simple explanation is that it's probably night time in the neighborhood of those particular stars that would be in the picture if it weren't night time in the neighborhood around those particular stars......

[Koen1]

Dammit, this is the last time I'm going to say it!

READ the posts! I NEVER said a moon base could be built for 2 million dollars!
This is something Shruggedatlas made up after incorrectly reading (or perhaps completely misunderstanding) my post where I said that:
after spending billions of dollars on developing technology to get to the moon, a COUPLE of million more for a moonbase (of some kind, I am not talking about huge lunar cities yet, bases can start out quite small you know) would be (relaitve) peanuts. In comparison to BILLIONS, "a couple of million" can be any amount up to tens or perhaps even hundreds of millions. Maybe the large numbers are what confuse you guys...

Imagine you have researched, developed, and built a car. Imagine that cost you $1000 over 10 years. Imagine that it now runs, but has no seats yet. Would you spend $100 on seats? Yes, of course you would. After 10 years of hard work and $1000 to make it all work, what is another $100? If that allows you to finally make good use of your technology and your car, then it's really a no-brainer.

Or maybe you cannot see the enormous potential advantages of a moonbase? It would allow for construction and launch of spacecraft much larger than we can ever feasibly and practically launch from earth. It would save huge amounts of fuel compared to earth-based launches, landing would be much easier than the controlled crashes they would have to do when landing on earth, and astronauts based there would have much less trouble with microgravity-related bone and muscle degradation after (and between) flights. And of course launches could be carried out without the public seeing them, if done on the "dark side".

All these reasons are militarily and tactically extremely advantageous. And all that for the great price of only what? 10% more of what the entire project had already cost? Jackpot.

oh and acp... "night time in the neighbourhood of those particular stars"?? Wtf?!
Are you actually saying that you believe when it becomes "night time" our star goes out, it stops shining?! Coocoo!
Did you forget all stars are huge balls of gas with ongoing fusion reactions causing them to emit light all the time?

[acp]

"a couple of million" can be any amount up to tens or perhaps even hundreds of millions. Maybe the large numbers are what confuse you guys...

No. You are confused. "Couple" when applied in this sense means two. A couple of million= 2 million.  You should look up the definition of couple.

Edit.. Haha, erm, well, I did look up the definition of couple in my oxford english dictionary and one entry for the word is "a small indefinite amount" so yes it doesn't have to mean explicitly two. But on the other hand it doesn't mean tens or hundreds either, that is clearly not a couple.

oh and acp... "night time in the neighbourhood of those particular stars"?? Wtf?!
Are you actually saying that you believe when it becomes "night time" our star goes out, it stops shining?! Coocoo! Smiley
Did you forget all stars are huge balls of gas with ongoing fusion reactions causing them to emit light all the time?