Comments for 'Power Multiplier Device, last resized (I hope)' appreciated.

[citfta]

Actually I was the one that said I would keep my comments to myself because I wasn't an engineer.  I have though worked as an industrial maintenance technician for many years so I think I have a good idea about how things mechanical work.

You have stated the small motor will raise the 2000 pound weight to the top and then turn off and as it goes back down it will cause the chain to turn the wheel with the generator.  What you are overlooking is if the 2000 pound weight can turn the generator then the weight will NEVER climb up the chain.  As the small motor turns the wheel and sprocket it will only pull the chain down and NOT pull the 2000 pound weight up.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[AB Hammer]

You have already stated that since I ask for qualified engineers you would keep your comments to yourself.
You have already proved you have little engineering knowledge because this simple mechanism had to be explained to you several times. You changed arrows to move the wrong way because you did not understand the design, but thought you did.
You are one of this site troublemakers, this game of yours is lame, I'm sorry that you need to do it.
   Russ

First line,   Wrong person

second line,   You showed you have little engineering with such a lacking design. (Outside of myself not completing the first correction of your already conflicting arrows on the   drawing for I was in a rush) I was showing you some simple flaws in your approach in the best correction of direction. For instance. Take a hundred pound weight and attach a  12 ft rope. Pull the weight from 2 ft away and then 12 ft away. Due to the distance you will get tired faster trying to pull from 12 ft away due to friction. You always want any device to pull closer to the object to get less friction. But a chain on 2 pulleys and around back up has absolutely no possible gain, so their is no need. Your simple system shows it didn't need it for it would not help. You need to open your ears and here what people are saying. I pointed to Chas Campbell  for all you are really trying to do is replace a flywheel with a chain.

Third line outlined in red,  You are sounding like a sock puppet of someone who has been banned from here with how you wrote it.

I have tried to help you but there seems to be have no room in your mind. To beat this game you must have an open mind.

One other thing. Learn how to post quotes and quit adding your writing inside them for it just look bad on your possible intelligence.


Sorry I had to come down on you but I don't like talking to a wall. Then talked down to from it.
It is not done and proved until it is done and proved.  Proof belongs to the person who claims so now it is your turn to prove me wrong.

[Russ Lee]

 To state the obvious.
  The radius of the large wheel will act as a lever to allow a 200 pound pull by the small motor (on the belt/chain around the large wheel) to raise the whole assembly weighing 2000 lbs up the main chain. Just as pushing down on a lever with a 200 lb. push will allow for the movement of a 2000 lb weight.
  The ratio is between the large radius of the wheel, and the small radius of the drive sprocket/gear seated in the main chain, seeing they share the same axle.
  Mistakes can come by being in a hurry once, but not twice. The first edit is a mistake, the second an indication. Both edits are incorrect.

Apologies to Citfta.

  citfta

[AB Hammer]

To state the obvious.
  The radius of the large wheel will act as a lever to allow a 200 pound pull by the small motor (on the belt/chain around the large wheel) to raise the whole assembly weighing 2000 lbs up the main chain. Just as pushing down on a lever with a 200 lb. push will allow for the movement of a 2000 lb weight.
  The ratio is between the large radius of the wheel, and the small radius of the drive sprocket/gear seated in the main chain, seeing they share the same axle.
  Mistakes can come by being in a hurry once, but not twice. The first edit is a mistake, the second an indication. Both edits are incorrect.

Apologies to Citfta.

  citfta

Well Russ, Just build it and prove you are correct. But as for your drawing you already had conflicting arrows as shown in your original drawing. 2 arrows going the wrong way for what you want it to go.

Also you post as Russ Lee not Citfta  LOL

http://overunity.com/16108/power-multiplier-device-last-resize-i-hope/

[sarkeіzen]

Shouldn't anything on overunity.com have more magnets in it...isn't there a minimum number of magnets to be accepted here?