Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sharing ideas on how to make a more efficent motor using Flyback (MODERATED)

Started by gotoluc, November 10, 2015, 07:11:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jimboot

Quote from: mihai.isteniuc on December 10, 2015, 04:02:40 AM
Hi to all,


Can this design be any good using magnetic cancellation and fly back recovery?


Mihai
I'll take a shot
Those ferromag core will flip polarity and so will be in full attraction mode.

mihai.isteniuc

Hi Jim and ty for taking time to reply.


The way i see it it's like this: energize the left coil to cancel magnetic flux from permanent magnets from left. The central magnets then are attracted by ferromagnetic core from left and repelled by the magnetic flux on the right. Ergo the central magnets are moving to the left. The process is then repeated by the other half of the system, so central magnets are gonna move to the right, inducing some electromagnetic power in central coil. This is one way to look at it ( and TL494 is a good IC to make this type of oscillator). Of course we recover fly-back energy from left coil, put some energy from the power supply and energize then the right coil, recover again fly-back and repeat the process.


The other possible way is to connect the two coils in series. In this configuration with the left coil we do magnetic cancellation while the right one is doing magnetic amplification, then reverse polarity. Again recover the fly-back pulse.  (BTW the idea with magnetic cancellation/amplification of a magnetic field came from the www.gap-power.com).


The real problem is: it is possible to make it work with a very short pulse of energy? As Verpies said (and my tests confirm) the pulse must have an optimum time duration. After that duration depletes we have to disconnect the power supply and collect the fly-back. My tests shows then 8-10% pulse width can lead to more then 70% of energy recover from fly-back pulse. Question: is this low time duration pulse able to do any useful magnetic work in the system (except of course fly-back pulse)?




Independent question about a coil; we have the following energy's when we send pulsed power to a coil:


- input energy=A
- losses energy (all of them)=B
- fly-back energy=C
- magnetic energy (if we consider magnetic field doing some useful work)=D


What is the mathematical relation between this energy's? A=?


mihai




conradelektro

I tried to harvest the energy in a fly back spike by help of a transformer (see the attached circuit diagram).

There is no motor. The drive coil (if there were a motor) is switched with a IRF840 transistor and a function generator.


It takes less than 720 mW to drive the circuit (i.e. the drive coil) and one can harvest about 15 mW from the fly back spike of the drive coil (via a transformer).


This test shows, that there is very little energy in the fly back spike. May be one has to use a better technique (not a transformer) to get more energy out of the fly back spike.

The set up provided the best output at 270 Hz. The drive coil is driven with a 50% duty cycle. At less than 40% duty cycle the output starts to drop.

I had to use a rather small capacitor of 47 nF. With a bigger capacitor ( e.g. 1 µF or 10 µF) the output dropped.

Greetings, Conrad

gotoluc

Quote from: conradelektro on December 10, 2015, 12:15:14 PM
It takes less than 720 mW to drive the circuit (i.e. the drive coil) and one can harvest about 15 mW from the fly back spike of the drive coil (via a transformer).

This test shows, that there is very little energy in the fly back spike. May be one has to use a better technique (not a transformer) to get more energy out of the fly back spike.

Greetings, Conrad

Hi Conrad,

thanks for taking the time to post your results.

I would agree that the power of your flyback would be very little as your coils DC resistance is very high.

Please find a MOT or other transformer that the primary or secondary is below 1 ohm and redo your test and post the difference.

Looking forward to see 8) the difference in the results

Thanks for sharing

Luc

conradelektro

Quote from: gotoluc on December 10, 2015, 12:32:20 PM
Hi Conrad,

thanks for taking the time to post your results.

I would agree that the power of your flyback would be very little as your coils DC resistance is very high.

Please find a MOT or other transformer that the primary or secondary is below 1 ohm and redo your test and post the difference.

Looking forward to see 8) the difference in the results

Thanks for sharing

Luc

Hi Luc!

May be you have misunderstood my circuit.

The drive coil has 90 Ohm DC resistance (a 12 V relays coil). What you and some people call the "high voltage coil" to regain something from the fly back spike is in my circuit the primary of a transformer (this primary has a DC resistance of 3000 Ohm). I changed my circuit diagram to indicate the transformer with a box around it.

I use a transformer, because it allows to decouple the energy in the fly back spike. On the secondary of this transformer one has then some sort of strange alternating current (see scope shot at pos 3 in the circuit) which could be used for something else.

You try to use the magnetic force in the second coil (the so called high voltage coil) to make the motor stronger. I try to get "electricity" out of the fly back spikes (at the secondary of a transformer).

Of course I could use a drive coil with only about 1 Ohm DC resistance (instead of my drive coil with 90 Ohm DC resistance). And then a transformer with a primary of about 30 Ohm DC resistance for getting "electricity" out of the fly back spikes. The input power will be much higher and also the output power at the 10 Ohm resistor. But the result will be similar (only about 2% of the input power can be harvested from the fly back spikes). More input results in more output, but the relative gain (about 2%) will be about the same.

What one could try, is a better technique than a transformer to decouple the energy in the fly back spikes. May be it is easier to regain magnetic force (as you try) and not "electricity" (as I try).

Greetings, Conrad