Inductive Kickback

[synchro1]

@synchro

KNOCK IT OFF WITH PERSONAL ATTACKS OR OUR DISCUSSION IS OVER!!

@Brad

Would you please rerun your test with a longer off time to allow the current to drop to zero?

@Citfta,

Drop dead!

[synchro1]

The Ossie moter clips the pulse and recovers a fraction of the Flyback; Igor runs his Reed switch motor at 100 percent duty cycle and recovers proportionally more power. Both motors run near COP 1. The difference is Igor's generating much more rotor flux. This extra flux could power satellite generator coils like Lidmotor's Maggie. These "Scope Junkys" just pedal nothing but Hocus Pocus.

[tinman]

@Tinman,

,[/b] 

Woopy's test was uncontrived and straight forward. You, on the other hand, have intentionally distorted the test conditions to confuse people and appear as some kind of savant. Your results are worthless. I see right through you! You're just a stinking charlatan and a retarded wanker.

I see you have resorted to insult's.
This normally happens when you cant admit you are wrong-which you are.

It dose not matter if you use a reed switch,transistor,or the FG with a free wheeling diode on the input-->on is on,and off is off. But feel free to post the scope shot of Woopy's primary coil that shows the current flow reversing when the reed switch opens.

How do you get a 30% percent on time with a Reed switch?

The reed switch can be moved closer to,or further away from the magnets on the rotor to adjust the on time of the reed switch. I am not sure why you find something so simple to be a difficult task.

You are artificially starving the pulse of sufficient power to even achieve a field collapse! You need to load the coil to saturation to get a violent field collapse and current reversal.

There will be no current reversal regardless of input power. And what is the point in saturating the inductor ?. Do you plan on boiling water with the coil?.

along with peak magnetic field strength for maximum rotor acceleration. Gotoluc is running a secondary coil on flyback. How is your pulse starvation approach supposed to help run his pulse motor and auxiliary Flyback power coil more efficiently?

Luc sends the inductive kickback current to a second inductor,where as i am sending it to an LED.

Milehigh has already exposed you as a hoaxer on the initial current fallacy.

Did he?
Quote post 51 from MH-->You are right about the current not changing direction but you are not right about the magnitude of the current.

The second part where MH says i am wrong about the magnitude is because he was talking about instantaneous current,and i was talking about average current per cycle. In regards to the instantaneous current,then MH is correct.

What dose MH and Verpies have to say
Verpies-That Igor guy and Synchro are wrong about the current through the inductor reversing when the inductor is opened.
MH-You are right about the current not changing direction.

Im sorry Synchro,but it is you that is wrong--<the current dose NOT reverse direction -regardless of what type of switch you use,or the amount of power you send to the inductor.

And no--you will not get me to join you in your name calling tactics 


Brad

[synchro1]

@Tinman,

Verpies and Milehigh are both full of shit just like you!

[tinman]

@synchro

KNOCK IT OFF WITH PERSONAL ATTACKS OR OUR DISCUSSION IS OVER!!

@Brad

Would you please rerun your test with a longer off time to allow the current to drop to zero?

I can do that