A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[seychelles]

i am sorry for bringing this up because it has nothing to do with this subject.
but the truth is too hard to bear sometime..

[Nink]

The direction is not good. The cause is natural, exacerbated by human pollutants.

Natural cooling and heating has always been happening. In 2015, those that don't know by now that we are helping to tip the scale in a negative way making it more difficult for the natural balances to occur, never will know.

Climate change, I think we all get this, but mass die offs with dozens of species in a given area is a little hard to deal with.  It is 16th of December, I live in Canada and I am walking around in a tshirt when I am normally wearing multiple layers, hats and gloves at this time of year, I am still driving on my summer slicks and we are planning a BBQ for Christmas.

We are way off topic now and as long as Oil is < $40 a barrel any implementations of known  green technology such as Wind / Solar / Wave / Tidal / Osmotic etc will  not have an ROI let alone people investing in Next Generation Graphene Super Batteries.

[Nink]

More interesting Claims

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jd6Q8Lssso

[MileHigh]

The major capacitor manufacturers are not asleep, so who knows what will happen in the long run.  Dishing out hyperbole does not get you any Brownie points in my book.  The other thing that "freaks me out" is that the senior technical officer mixes up the terms energy and power in a five minute video clip about half a dozen times.

Look at this YouTube comment from the clip:  "Guess who just brought 500 dollars of your company stock? THIS GUY, don't let me down Robert I believe in you! this will change the world!"

[Nink]

I am curious why we don't want to weigh the entire supercapicitor we just weigh the grafoil before and after you wipe off "the active material" and assume the delta is the weight of the material responsible for storing energy. Also curious why we don't weigh the grafoil before the activated carbon is applied only after we wipe off the activated carbon.   

I am guessing the assumption is that grafoil does not play any part in the energy storage process it is merely a conductor that was used instead of some other type of conductive foil because he likes using heavy thick expensive carbon based materials that don't play a part in the energy storage process versus cheap aluminum foil.

The only thing that is responsible for energy storage in this supercapitor is apparently the activated carbon and not the actual carbon based foil.  If you watch the previous video a demonstration of a dip coated activated carbon on grafoil is shown to be a better supercap than a thermally reduced graphene oxide drop coated grafoil.  This I guess was done to demonstrate that the grafoil has no part in the process.

Is this actually the case ?