Rotating Magnetic Field's and Inductors.

tinman · December 16, 2015, 11:28:17 PM

Quote from: MileHigh on December 16, 2015, 07:26:29 PM
Okay, so you trimmed back the pulse width on the setup with the spinning rotor in place so you get 74 mA @ 12.49 volts going into charging battery. In other words, the output from the coil is 74 mA @ 12.49 volts and that's the narrowest pulse that gives you that power output. You "trimmed up" the pulse for the narrowest pulse that will give you the maximum output. The duty cycle ON time is 23%. The pulse is so narrow that you had to use a motorized rubber wheel to spin up the rotor to get it to sync up with the function generator pulse.

Then you stop your rotor and measure the power input which is 240 mA @ 12.47 V. The output is the same, 74 mA @ 12.49V.

However, with the rotor spinning, the input power is 180 mA @ 12.47 volts. That is less than the case with the rotor stopped or removed.

WOW.

And you have the gall to say this, "Maybe some one else will post my exact words for you MH,so as you dont have to go and watch it again," trying to pretend that I didn't catch that or see that or whatever.

Everything I have posted in this thread has fully acknowledged your measurements so stop playing that game. In addition, I have explained your real-world measurements and what they mean between something like three and five times in this thread already.

If you are not understanding what I am saying, just ask me. Lay your cards on the table, don't bluff if you are not understanding something. Don't zone out or feign that I am not seeing what you are presenting in your clips because I saw what you said and I fully acknowledged what you said and acknowledged your measurements in this very thread about 10 times.

To me it looks like you are doing nothing more than saying, "You are not seeing my numbers so you must be daft." Nothing could be further from the truth. I saw and acknowledged your numbers and explained it all - several times already.

The bottom line is this: It's not me that has to look at your clips because "I am not catching something" - It's you that has to reread this thread and try to understand it and come back if you have any comments or questions and I will be pleased to respond. It's time for you to stop this "revolving door" where you say "look at my clips" because I have looked at your clips. Just read the thread and that will be readily apparent.

MileHigh

You have completely lost the plot MH.
Everything I have posted and shown is fact, and everything you have posted is wrong, and only wrong because it dosnt conform to you outdated understandings.

I give you 1 opportunity here to tell me how you would like me to tune the pulse width to optimum coil performance before the rotor is bought into play-I will follow your instructions to the letter. We will calculate that efficiency before and then after the rotor is bought into play. When I once again show that the rotor with the magnets increases the efficiency above your optimum efficiency, you are then to explain as to how that happened.

I will tell you right now MH, your conservation of energy law will not hold up in this situation. But now is your chance to prove me wrong-which you are yet to do.

Brad