Rotating Magnetic Field's and Inductors.

[MileHigh]

In 1831 Michael Faraday discovered Induction, MileHigh still has not discovered it!!!!! You driveling old Git!!!!

Will you get over your ridiculous Faraday fetish you twit?  I suppose the explanation for what is happening in Tinman's experiment is over your head since you don't understand how a coil works.  Do you remember when we had the discussion with MarkE?

[EMJunkie]

Will you get over your ridiculous Faraday fetish you twit?  I suppose the explanation for what is happening in Tinman's experiment is over your head since you don't understand how a coil works.  Do you remember when we had the discussion with MarkE?

Are you Blind and Stupid?

Your ability to CHOOSE Ignorance over Logic and Evidence is just too overwhelming for some people!!!

By the way, Your Computer is POWERED the very same principle's that Michael Faraday gave you 184 Years ago!!! But I know, you CHOOSE to be ignorant of it!

The PROOF speaks volumes, MileHigh is just a cretin that has no desire to look at facts!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: MarkE never dismissed Faraday's Laws of Induction, he was much smarter than that!!!

[MileHigh]

How about you just stop making silly gratuitous attacks and instead discuss the subject at hand in the thread?

[EMJunkie]

How about you just stop making silly gratuitous attacks and instead discuss the subject at hand in the thread?

TOPIC: Rotor makes for a HIGHER Efficiency - Proven to be true.

I propose there is enough evidence to say "Faradays Law of Induction" is clearly seen on the Scope Shots Tinman has provided.

You dispute the evidence...

So who is really distracting the masses here? Its you MileHigh.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[MileHigh]

TOPIC: Rotor makes for a HIGHER Efficiency - Proven to be true.

I propose there is enough evidence to say "Faradays Law of Induction" is clearly seen on the Scope Shots Tinman has provided.

No, the only thing that has been proven is that adding the rotor increased the overall impedance of the coil.  Why is that?  Where is the power going without the rotor vs. with the rotor?  What is transpiring inside the coil when there is no rotor in place vs. when there is a rotor in place?

I have already stated that the coil will be more efficient without a rotor in place.  Brad can prove that for himself if he wants to by doing the test.  The lower the final current in the coil (shorter pulse) before the transistor switches off the more efficient the coil will be.

Please stop the Straw Man argument where you state that I am denying Faraday, it's laughable.