Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rotating Magnetic Field's and Inductors.

Started by tinman, December 14, 2015, 09:08:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Quote from: gotoluc on December 18, 2015, 12:20:10 AM
Here is my new test device which uses the coils flyback to do work.

Link to video demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8kwdrHCyig

Same observation, it's more efficient with the coil and magnet rotor.

Luc

What do you mean by "efficiency?"   I asked you the last time you posted something and you did not answer so I am asking you again for this new posting.

What I am seeing in your scope captures is that without a rotor in place the current draw of the coil increases so your math trace shows increased power consumption of the coil.  That's pretty much expected.  I don't think I see any measurements for the back spike power.  So what information are we supposed to be getting from your scope captures?

verpies

Quote from: tinman on December 17, 2015, 11:17:23 PM
I think you have my DUT mixed up with Luc's, as I have never had a recovery cap with a 1K ohm resistor--I have always had the second battery recieving the recovered energy.
I don't think so.
You posted this schematic here.

Aslo, I was writing about a 100Ω resistor, not 1K, because I heard/saw one in your video.

tinman

Quote from: verpies on December 18, 2015, 02:01:36 AM
I don't think so.
You posted this schematic here.

Aslo, I was writing about a 100Ω resistor, not 1K, because I heard/saw one in your video.

Verpies

Your in the wrong thread. This thread i have always used the SSG circuit with second battery,not the schematic you posted. Read the very first post of this thread,and watch the very first video. The schematic you posted is from Luc's thread-not this one.

To go mixing up different schematics from different threads will only add confusion.


Brad

tinman

Quote from: gotoluc on December 18, 2015, 12:20:10 AM
Here is my new test device which uses the coils flyback to do work.

Link to video demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8kwdrHCyig

Same observation, it's more efficient with the coil and magnet rotor.

Luc

Hey Luc
The video is set to private--cant view it.

Brad

gotoluc

Quote from: tinman on December 18, 2015, 04:30:07 AM
Hey Luc
The video is set to private--cant view it.

Brad

Yes, sorry about that. I forgot to make it public after I edited the two parts together.
Should be good to go now.

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8kwdrHCyig

The circuit used is as below.
I inverted Ch2 to keep the scope shots looking like the previous or else the voltage would be inverted to the current?

Luc