My Levitators and Bearings ( and other ) Designs/inventions

[guest1289]

New  Magnetic-Levitators( FUNCTION AT ANY ANGLE IN RELATION TO GRAVITY ), Magnetic-Bearings, and DC-Brushless-Motors, and Levitating Novelty/Toys .

If anyone finds anything that I should properly and fully 'Patent',   in what I am putting in this post,  then please let me know .
    (  I have filed them at patent-offices,  but not actually patented them )

  I HAVE ATTACHED A  PDF FILE,  AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POST (   PUBLIC - THE DESIGNS.pdf ),  containing my designs/inventions (  OR, download it at  https://sites.google.com/site/johnbackermydesigns/pdf-file-containing-my-designs-inventions   )

   Also, below, are some pictures of my Magnetic-Levitators( only using permanent-magnets ) .
      -  The Levitators in the pictures are intended to FUNCTION AT ANY ANGLE IN RELATION TO GRAVITY, THEY ARE NOT JUST LEVITATORS .

    In the PDF file,  there are Magnetic-Levitators( FUNCTION AT ANY ANGLE IN RELATION TO GRAVITY ), Magnetic-Bearings ( and DC-Brushless-Motors ) and Levitating Novelty/Toys .

       In the PDF file :
                -  Magnetic-Levitators               -   PDF-Pages 1 - 15
                -  Magnetic-Bearings                 -   PDF-Pages 16 - 22
                -  DC Brushless-Motors             -   PDF-Pages 23 - 25
                -  Levitating Novelty/Toys         -   PDF-Pages 26 - 32
                -  More designs                         -   PDF-Pages 32 - .. 

[sm0ky2]

This is genius

This opens up a whole world of possibilities, potential solutions to magnetic problems


the idea of anchoring it through magnetic attraction, then allowing the anchors and/or repellors to move in constrained degrees of motion.......

im going to be busy with this for a while, Thank you good sir !!!

P.S. - I applaud you for making this information public. Generally I am against patenting when it comes to "free energy",
but this is much bigger than that, so if you have a way to make money on certain aspects of your designs I say go for it, the toy industry might just make you rich.

[guest1289]

This, is the very simplest of my designs, that should result in :

    'Passive All Permanent Magnet Full levitation'

See the diagram below :

On a flat table,   make a circle( using a magnetic-strip ),  and inside of that circle,  make another smaller-circle( using another magnetic-strip ).

- 'The Larger Circle'( 'A' ),  should have it's North-Pole facing inwards towards the 'The Smaller Circle'.
- 'The Smaller Circle'( 'B' ),  should have it's North-Pole facing outwards towards the 'The Larger Circle'.

Now,  get a flat-disc-magnet( with a large hole in the middle), so,  basically it is a 'Flat-Ring Magnet'( 'C' ),   this 'Flat-Ring-Magnet' should be at least as large( in diameter ) as 'The Larger Circle' mentioned above,  and,  the symmetrical hole in the middle of this  'Flat-Ring-Magnet' should mean that the thickness of this 'Flat-Ring-Magnet' completely covers 'The Larger Circle' and the 'The Smaller Circle'( and obviously it covers the space in between 'The Larger Circle' and the 'The Smaller Circle' ) when  'The Smaller Circle'  is symmetrically placed inside of the 'The Larger Circle' ,  and the 'Flat-Ring-Magnet' is placed above  'the larger circle'.

  [  Note :   In the diagram below,  the upper-side( facing up to the sky ) of the 'Flat-Ring-Magnet' is the North-Pole,  and the bottom-side( facing down to components labelled 'A' and 'B'  ) of the 'Flat-Ring-Magnet' is the south-pole. ]

The result should be;  'Passive All Permanent Magnet Full levitation'
____________

    From something I saw functioning on youtube yesterday, it seems that 'Earnshaw's Theorem' no longer applies to normal permanent-magnets,  that 'Passive All Permanent Magnet Full levitation' has been possible for at least, just under a decade .
___________

   If anyone( including manufacturing companys, patent-lawyers ) is interested in my designs,  send me an email to john.backerwww@gmail.com 

[sm0ky2]

Earnshaw's theorem still applies, and always has.
even in the passive example above, if examined closely with no wind
I believe you will find his principals in perfect working order.

what changes is peoples interpretation of it.

[guest1289]

 -  I have sent the youtube link to you,  instead of posting it,  for the reason described in the message.

Yes,   but a  passive-magnetic-levitation-device which visually( without magnification ) appears as stable as an electrical-magnetic-levitation-device ,  would certainly make many people think twice .

The video,  is a strong indication that a built model of my simple designs could function ,  if anyone builds any of my designs, or anything similar,  post them anywhere on this site .