I have a proven model I built. I am looking for like minded people who know more

[sm0ky2]

Well then bring a bucket of energy and we'll compare yours to mine and we'll see who has more energy?

you do understand that a simple "worm-gear" will do this, without all the extra losses, right?
you are complicating the situation, for no reason...

Test it out, compare "your system" to a worm gear of the same diameter as your output,
geared to the same RPM as your output.

using the same drive motor, determine which operates "better".

[memoryman]

It seems that MeGaFaRR  has a lack of understanding about torque/force power, energy and work. They are related but not the same. Either self-looping or a thorough measurement of input/out energy will prove something; not eyeballing.

[MeGaFaRR]

It seems that MeGaFaRR  has a lack of understanding about torque/force power, energy and work. They are related but not the same. Either self-looping or a thorough measurement of input/out energy will prove something; not eyeballing.

To memoryman:
Do tell me then: Does a 2000 lbs. flywheel rotating at 3500 rpm's have more stored energy than a 1 lbs. flywheel rotating at 3500 rpm's?

[memoryman]

kinetic energy is calculated by k.e.=m x V^2. Where did that energy come from?

[MeGaFaRR]

kinetic energy is calculated by k.e.=m x V^2. Where did that energy come from?

Exactly, where as most of my stored energy comes from the stored energy already in the system, then as I add flywheels with clutches and and motor already rotating to the total, then I am not using just the input from the power source, I am using both. I am using the stored energy already there and I add approximately 60% of the total flywheels to the total. Thus keeping the energy required from power source input to a minimum. So in conclusion again:

Which has more stored energy in a 2000 lbs flywheel rotating at 3500 lbs.?

1) A flywheel that requires 30 hp motor to get it up and running to speed (1 minute)

2) or with my system in place with 1 hp motor (1 minute)

Again same stored energy but which system used more energy to get it to full rpm's?

So again as I have claimed that "MY SYSTEM ALLOWS YOU TO REDUCE THE INPUT REQUIRED FROM A POWER SOURCE TO GET A FULL SET OF FLYWHEELS TO FULL RPMS OF THIS POWER SOURCE AND/OR TO INCREASE THE STORED ENERGY OUTPUT FROM THE FULL SET OF FLYWHEELS."
So no matter what size input you start with as long as this power source can start the set of maybe 5 flywheels ( again sized to correspond with size of input power source) and then add as many sets of flywheels you want, it will always be enough to do what I claim.

I'm not the physicist or mathematician to tell me when my system will run into a problem with drag and resistance but I've proven that I could add way more flywhee to it, to gain a lot more stored energy.

I really appreciate all the comments lately, they have been rather enjoyable to help this discussion along as opposed to the naysayer comments that appeared at the beginning of my thread. As I said I really enjoy positive criticism, and thank you for making my poor little, frazzled and aged brain do some work. Hopefully we can all get along. Lol