Centrifugal Power Source: The Linevich Story

[Temporal Visitor]

"OBSERVED ENERGY FACTS:
1. All Matter has potential energy, matter in motion develops Kinetic energy.

2. Less energy input is required per second to sustain matter in motion than is developed per second beyond the objects threshold Velocity." - from http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/facts.html "

1: matter in motion does not develop Kinetic energy: it HAS Kinetic energy when in motion.
2. "Less energy input is required per second to sustain matter in motion than is developed per second beyond the objects threshold Velocity." WRONG: NO energy is required to sustain matter in motion,  UNLESS ANOTHER FORCE (such as friction) acts on the matter in motion. Then only the exact same amount of energy as 'lost' (converted) is needed to return to the same velocity.

For the benefit of others, and as an ACT to be kind to you, quoting from http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/energy.html this addresses your thinking/understanding which is very common.

"* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This is accepted as fact and known by the scientific and physics communities.
Placing ANY matter in motion requires Force to overcome Inertia and friction.
ANY and ALL Matter in motion DEVELOPS Kinetic energy within the Matter itself by an act of Nature.     

I certainly agree there are losses with every conversion, transfer of "energy", power or force. We know this to be fact and true. My research and thoughts on why it is like it is go deep but suffice it to say we have been doing things for centuries that are not as efficient as they can be. As men we unnecessarily tend to over complicate everything we do. Ponder this: If E = mc2 : then

1. What form of "energy" was Albert thinking of?

2. What state of matter? Any and All matter or unobtainium?

3. If a particle of matter becomes "Pure energy" at the speed of light squared is that not a conversion and subject to the same losses we live with today? Or would that mean that we "created energy" which we have already ruled out as not within our capability as mortal men to "create" anything, let alone "energy" itself?

4. Would the "energy" DEVELOP progressively with Velocity or just poof into existence all of a sudden?

5. Would not two particles double the energy by simple addition?

6. Would not multiple particles simply multiply the energy?

What do we get if we DEVELOP and ADD ADDITIONAL "ENERGY" exceeding the very real losses at every such conversion we currently accept as just the way it is?"

AND

Quoting from: http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/planes.html
"The only limits as to how much Kinetic Energy can be developed are our own thinking and the physical structural limits of matter we have available to place in motion."

You can "think" I am "wrong", but that doesn't change reality. Can you please make thoughtful reply, especially to #4?

[memoryman]

"ANY and ALL Matter in motion DEVELOPS Kinetic energy within the Matter itself by an act of Nature." that is false; please clarify what you mean by 'act of Nature'.
1: why does that matter? (pun intended)
2: ALL matter
3: "If a particle of matter becomes "Pure energy" at the speed of light squared" that applies to photons, which have no mass-at-rest; it does not apply to all matter. What we call 'losses are a name given to energy in a form that we don't want (e.g. heat).
4: it gets transferred/converted from the driving force according to e=mv^2, so, gradually.
5: yes
6: yes; "What do we get if we DEVELOP and ADD ADDITIONAL "ENERGY" exceeding the very real losses at every such conversion we currently accept as just the way it is?" that is a speculation, not a fact. There is NO evidence that this can/does occur.

"The only limits as to how much Kinetic Energy can be developed are our own thinking and the physical structural limits of matter we have available to place in motion." again, you make a statement without backing it with evidence or proof.

Your fundamental errors are in how you use language: changing/converting are not the same as developing. LoT1 states: "the total energy of an isolated system is constant; energy can be transformed from one form to another, but neither can it be created nor it can be destroyed." note that the word 'develop' is not used.

[lancaIV]

http://www.dlinevitch.narod.ru/Eng/3zakN.pdf

[memoryman]

Show me ONE actual device (not a youtube video or patent application or pdf or claim) that uses these principles.

[lancaIV]

Show me ONE actual device (not a youtube video or patent application or pdf or claim) that uses these principles.

Victor Arestov http://arestov.de/index.php/de/ 
  Edvid Linevich R&D co-partner
https://www.xing.com/communities/posts/alternative-loesung-zur-energiegewinnung-1003340445
Der russische Wissenschaftler Edwid Linevich (Vladivostok) hat im August 2007 ein Patent für einen Unwuchtmotor angemeldet, der den Weg in zu einer umweltverträglichen Stromversorgung ebnen kann. Die Funktionfähigkeit des Motors wurde mit einem Testmodell im März 2008 unter Beweis gestellt. http://www.perpetuumobile.eu Die Testergebnisse sind erstaunlich:
Bei einer Leistungsaufnahme von nur 25 Watt entwickelt der Motor eine Leistung von 400 Watt .

call to him and ask about the prototype

an other "offer" from India :
                   faked reality ?
http://www.worldlever.com/narasimman.html
this compared with :
https://www.google.com/patents/US8541894 Jerry Blevins (R.I.P.) JBpower
http://jbpowersystems.weebly.com/index.html