"ENERGY of FUTURE COMPANY"

[rakarskiy]

In the final instance 55 (11 * 5) coils and twelve poles on the rotor
http://realstrannik.com/media/kunena/attachments/417/Motor_wires2.png

This is the details, all based on the same design with autorotation
The coils are made (with the author's words) bifilar manner.
Bifilyar convention, the coil has two separate windings in the inductive coupling. When this rule is not satisfied Lenz during operation with the magnetic flux.
http://realstrannik.com/media/kunena/attachments/417/Motor_wires2.png
Switching "bifilar coils" looks
http://ua-hho.do.am/_pu/2/s38779540.jpg
But with such a switching rule Lenz will be executed, and the construction will stop.
If we apply the "Russian bifilyar" http://bd.patent.su/2355000-2355999/pat/servl/servlet580e.html , the field will be on the induction Lenz ?  (in the attachment)
All those wishing to goodness and wisdom !!!!

[rakarskiy]

Researcher Dmitry from Russia, virtually repeated the M-G Andrew Slobodyan. Applying his scheme, but retaining the principle of a closed circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV6qFKe4Aow

and Figure chart analysis from me.
http://ua-hho.do.am/_pu/2/23424250.jpg

[lancaIV]

Do you remeber the "Lutec"-device ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g59cGTswGCI


-------------------------------- 1stage ~ 1 Zylinder  360°/1   phase~R in RPM
- -------------------------------2             2                360°/2   shift,here shaft, um(=circum)venting[/size]
-------------------------------- 3             3                360°/3
-------------------------------- 4             4                360°/4
-------------------------------- 5             5                360°/5


and so on


circrumventing barriers: 2 dimensional to 3/4 dimensional devices,modular


http://overunity.com/16535/energy-of-future-company/dlattach/attach/157001/image//
= ------------------------------------- stage 1
   so
   ------------------------------------- stage 2 coupling


the ,yours,"wheel" concept so small,but I think you know greater "rotor/statot" devices:
                        very large expanded
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2014/02/meet-the-new-worlds-biggest-wind-turbine.html
also called "turbines" using the "turbo-lenz priciple" !
Why only "1 rotor(how many blades/Blaetter in german)-engine" ?
http://home.earthlink.net/~fradella/green.htm
entering here:
http://home.earthlink.net/~fradella/RPMgenerator.htm
                                                   un-/compressed
compare this: http://home.earthlink.net/~fradella/VAWT-in-diverter.jpg                                                     winding force ?
with                http://overunity.com/16535/energy-of-future-company/dlattach/attach/157001/image//    winding force ?
and                http://overunity.com/16535/energy-of-future-company/dlattach/attach/160434/image//     winding force ?




                                                very large area/space expansion to very high -to shaft and rotation-compression
                                                                          diverter ?:  equalizer ? divider ?


http://overunity.com/16535/energy-of-future-company/dlattach/attach/160434/image//
this image,from you delivered, above represent the wheel-/turbine-concept circumventing magnets in linear position
like the Figuera-Buforn Jacas transformer


its represents a couple of electro- and/or permanent magnets:


the question as rotational -motor/conventional generator device :
from M=middlepoint(shaftcenter)  r=radius d=diameter from the real/virtual wheel ? inside area ?
inside area ,in german called: Mantelflaeche ,Mantel(as physics idiom ,not -directly,but also- collar ~ cover,meaning)in english ?
( for re-/searcher probably of interest :Prantl,Magnus,Coriolis)


but making this discurs shorter and imaginable:
going to the world-wide mankind com(m)ercial ideas heritage archiv called espacenet.org :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=oskar+becker&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search
you/the re-/searcher will find ,related SYNERGIE/SYNERGY,by the inventor Oskar Becker
several solutions,with his own evolution steps,of(f)ered !


the magnets couple on a greater wheel ,diameter f.e. 1 mtr., and not using only 1 wheel,but a wheel-battery,battery~ several 2,3,4,...... wheels but with only 1 shaft
                                           
                                                   variation possibilities
wheel-/rotor numbers,magnets numbers per wheel,electro-or/and permanent magnets , each em/pm magnetic Tesla-force,wheel/rotor-diameter,ccw or cw roting,horizontal or vertical position,wheel-device material, output kinetic and kinetic force use,output kinetic and couple with generator for electric conversion,couple with generators on each shaft north/south side  et ..... cetera




The Clou,the nature trick ?
Probably inside this other german inventor publication(I give it google translated,with all automatic machine hints of wrong -senseless-translation)   
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fworldwide.espacenet.com%2FpublicationDetails%2Fdescription%3FCC%3DDE%26NR%3D3602039A1%26KC%3DA1%26FT%3DD%26ND%3D3%26date%3D19860619%26DB%3DEPODOC%26locale%3Den_EP&edit-text=


Great rotoric wheel and small rotoric wheel
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19320121&CC=GB&NR=365209A&KC=A


One Life CLOU is : to listen to the outside radio (and then the inside radio) RADIOMETRIE
!!!!!!! [/size]?? +/- german emoj translation: Huch,nix verstaehn ! Watt nu los,against all my dogma !
                               DOGMA and DOMINION: you belongs bodily and mentally whom ?
                                      SELF-DECISION SEEMS SOMETIMES VERY HARD

[KSPER]

hello rakarsky!

i follow the link of the patent from slobodan andrew and the magnetic motor,re wound my 8 coils at the same way explained into the patent...
before i use still bifilar coils but wound together,the result was not really good...the rotor tune only 1 minute...now with this new arrangment,it turn 3,40 minute and give 2 times more voltage than with the first way of winding ..before i get 1 volt max,NOW I HAVE 3,9 volt when i start it by pushing...it is sure there is a good progress by following the patent indications,but.... it cannot turn alone at the moment,i think there is something to change into the organisation of magnets on the rotor...what do you think about it? in other words,i mean i can get highter energy with very less mechanic torque ,by using the way of winding the coils as it is show into the patent link,i think (stop me if am wrong) even as it is right now,if i could coupling it mecanicely (by belt)to an asynchronous motor,it could allready give benefits? the fact to cancel 100% of the magnetic break of each coils seems to be a barrier that is falling down,isnt it??

another point i can clean up: the way of connection of coils that is  propose on the shematic in color doesn not work: it create to much drag and fell down the time of rotation at 9 poor seconds,so the electric connexion show is not the good,in order to cancel the "magnetic break" of each coils,is to "short cut" between them the + and the - of a side of each coils,thats the best i found out to cancel the magnetic opposite field on my table top .... witche allow me to access at 3,40 minute of rotation global...

-is this patent complete?? i mean,there is only one page (i tranlate all the text on it allready),but nothing is explain about magnets agencement around the rotor?

i can just confirm something: tesla compared voltage as a pressure: the more there is a huge voltage,the more it turns for a long time,it is completly true ,i checked it those last days... i think am not so far to get the goal,and i think ,because now my coils are winding with the good way,there is only a modification to do about the magnets on the rotor,because i tried the arrangment indicate on the shematic of the patent (switchicg north/south) and it does not work...i re used my own organisation of magnet witche consist to a complete unbalanced/balanced arrangment of weight and polority and then,i access by it at 3.40 minute of rotation non stop....

my question is: what type of arrangment with magnet could i try again,if we considere that the coils are winding in the absolute and ultim good one? result is allready impressiv if i compare it with my first winding coils,indeniabely it bring something definitly better to this table top...but still not enough..

well,if we can discuss about it,could be cool,and lotta thanks for your help!

[KSPER]

hello,is there somebody to check the post here or not?

i posted a first post here couple of days ago and still no checked by moderators,why???

to continue with this subject:

-i can tell now,the disposion of magnet on the shematic is wrong too: by putting magnets in switching face (north,south,north,south...) it produce less electricity than when all magnets are facing only north pole....so forget the switching mode,it is useless.
the only true stuff of the shematic is the embobinment in switching coil forms,it really works! before doing it,my motor turned only 1 minute,now it turns in an average of 5 minutes/5 minutes 30 sec!....this arrangment of coil is perfect and true,it avoid lenz law completly,no cogging and no drag anymore....about the voltage getting out,before it was only 2 volt at the biginning with a maximum speed,now it is about 21 volt when i start it...!

CONCLUSION:
-by winding coil the way of the patent,things change drastiquelly:
  1) negation complete of lenz law
  2) rising up of the voltage output
  3) the circuit is open,you get the max voltage between the 2 last point (logical)
  4)no cogging
  5)no electro magnetic drag by leting the circuit open and produce a difference of potencial between the first point and the last one.
  6)when i closed up the circuit,a magnetic break appears (lentz law is back)
  7)by this winding arrangment,possibility to create a big amount of energy,with a minimum mechanic force involved (witche fit perfectly with what "gary tripp" from sav infinity is talking about in his videos plus on the papers of sav team avalable to read on internet--->quote:"if it can run 5 minute on his own energy,then it can run forever"---->my sample work an average of 5 minute as i allready wrote just before)
 
hypothese:
-by coupling a bigger system mechaniquely (belt for exemple),to a normal asynchronous motor,according to the fact that less force is involved to give a bigger amount of energy if compare to a "classic" alternator,benefit can be crazy (i guess so)