Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

Started by gravityblock, April 28, 2016, 12:14:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc, Concave, or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

The earth is a flat round disc!
The earth is a flat round disc with a dome!
The earth is a round speriical globe!
The earth is concave!

gravityblock

Quote from: MileHigh on May 05, 2016, 03:31:38 PM
This sort of reminds me of the "Intelligent Design" people that believe that the Earth is 6000 years old, including the dinosaurs.

There is scene in The Sopranos where Tony says, "Like the Flintstones?"

Is this proof for a flat earth or a spherical globe?  No, so your post is spam and you're trolling!  If you want to start a thread on the above, then be my guest.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

Pirate88179

Quote from: gravityblock on May 05, 2016, 02:42:09 PM
A horizon indicator is how a planes fly level and maintains a certain altitude above sea level.  I can find you an image of a horizon indicator which shows the wings are 100% level with the horizon, instead of 99.98%, if you like.  Is that necessary?  Will that change anything?  Of course not!  You made a poor argument as usual, so get over it and stop balling!

Gravock

Well, it is only that you called that gauge by the wrong name and then were not accurate about what the gauge was reading...and how it is used in flight by pilots...other than that...


Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

gravityblock

Quote from: Pirate88179 on May 05, 2016, 04:03:58 PM
Well, it is only that you called that gauge by the wrong name and then were not accurate about what the gauge was reading...and how it is used in flight by pilots...other than that...


Bill

I didn't call the gauge by the wrong name!  It's known as an attitude indicator (AI), a gyro horizon, horizon indicator, artificial horizon, or an attitude director indicator.  What the gauge was reading and how it's used in flight by pilots was a snapshot taken from wikipedia.  The wings were a hair line away from being 100% level with the horizon, so don't get your panties all in a knot.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

gravityblock

Quote from: CANGAS on May 05, 2016, 05:53:42 AM
A bit of good sense in this desert. Bless you, Pi.

The wing automatically makes lift depending on the the density of the air it is in. And, that lift varies as the airspeed varies. So, if the power setting is left constant, the lift gets bigger if the wing goes into denser air, and, the lift gets smaller if the wing goes into thinner air.

The density of the air is governed by the strength of gravity, whether the source of gravity is the flat plane or the spherical globe. The strength of gravity varies with the altitude above the ground (not exactly, but it makes little difference). 

So, the plane as a whole will pretty much automatically hold the same altitude above the ground in "normal" conditions. That is, with no "touches" on the controls needed.

CANGAS 231

Flat Earth | All Meat & No Potatoes

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

Modern-Messenger

I always get flak when trying to discuss this subject. Whether from Status Quo, Dis-Informants, Information-Suppressors, the Brain-Washed Materialists, College-Indoctrinated Self-Righteous Graduates, etc. The content gets ignored, dogmatic minds choose vitriol against character rather than merits of evidence/analysis, believers of so-called modern-day science react like dogmatic religious fundamentalists instead of genuine researchers/scientists, etc. With that having been said/typed/written...
Quote from: gravityblock on April 28, 2016, 12:14:07 PM
Please participate in the poll.  Users are allowed to change their vote at any time!

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believe is false" - William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981).

Flat earthers (FE) and ballers, present your evidence and prepare your rebuttals.

Gravock
...I have to throw forth a few questions and my reasons for the following questions (hey this glow-effect is pretty cool)...

Question : Why are the Poll-Questions limited into polemic-style options ?
Reason For Question : I have looked into Flat-Earth Evidence/Theory for a significant amount of time and, upon double-checking over all information on many sides of the fences, I have reason to believe that there can be validity to both, perhaps for reasons that are not yet understood, such as a trait/principle/undiscovered aspect of Quantum-Physics that allows for both to be true simultaneously (instead of only one or the other for reasons, like I mentioned, that may not yet be understood).

Oups, I was sure I had other questions beyond that, but those will probably be answered or become apparent with any responses I get.