Free Energy from Electromagnetic Wave Fields

[ZL]

If anybody else knows how the wave machine works, then please help Alex and explain.

[shylo]

ZL your quote: "A hint that will give away the working principle: gravity has nothing to do with it. It would work the same (or nearly the same) in zero gravity in space as well."

Gravity is what makes the machine work. He lifts the arm to create the wave. Or he pushes the balanced arm down, which lifts the opposite end. Gravity then takes over when he releases it.

Also his math is incomplete, you need to calculate the lengths of the arms in reference to the center axis.
Interesting video ,but the more waves, the more unpredictable the outcome.
artv

[ZL]

Gravity is what makes the machine work. He lifts the arm to create the wave. Or he pushes the balanced arm down, which lifts the opposite end. Gravity then takes over when he releases it.

OK, if you think you know this better, then please educate us, and explain in detail how the machine works, and why it works that way. Does it support then gravity waves? How would it behave in zero gravity on a space station, and why? Can you write down the equations that govern the wave propagation in the device? We need specifics, detailed explanation, and real understanding. Without that we can not proceed with wave energetics.

Also his math is incomplete, you need to calculate the lengths of the arms in reference to the center axis.

Exactly what is wrong with his math? Again, please be specific. Show us where the error is, and how you would calculate the same in a correct manner.

[shylo]

It's a bunch of balanced weights.
I disrupt that balance by, either lifting or pushing down, then release, the work I put in is translated.
To me the real observation is, what he didn't do was ,interrupt the wave.
Or let the wave interact.Not the same as when he added the second machine. It just had shorter tines.
artv

[ZL]

It's a bunch of balanced weights. I disrupt that balance by, either lifting or pushing down, then release, the work I put in is translated.

This sounds like Bessler Wheel logic. But just saying this will not bring it home to you. Therefore let us pick apart your explanation, and examine the validity of each claim and idea.

If the wave machine is only a bunch of balanced weights for you, then why don't you start checking your theory by examining one single balanced weight? Imagine a modified special seesaw, which is not close to the ground, but it is at a height which allows the arms to make complete rotations around the axis. Now, you do the same as Prof. did in the video. You grab one end of the balanced seesaw, move it down a little and immediately move it up again into its starting position. Before you release the seesaw, make sure that the arm is stationary (v=0) just like it was before the start of our experiment. Now will this seesaw perform any oscillatory movement like it was observed in the wave machine? If gravity is the restoring force of any potential oscillation (like in the case of a simple pendulum), then your seesaw must oscillate.

An alternative experiment is to just rise one end of the seesaw, make sure that it is stationary, and release it. Will it start to oscillate like a pendulum?

I don't respond to the second part of your post, because it makes no sense at all, and first we have to get you understand what is wrong with your explanation.