Graham Gunderson's Energy conference presentation Most impressive and mysterious

[Vortex1]

Spokane1

The beauty of your schematic tells me you not only understand electronics very well, but can communicate your knowledge with a clearly drawn representation.

A good schematic is a work of art for those that can appreciate it.

Regards
Vortex1 / ION

[Spokane1]

Spokane1

The beauty of your schematic tells me you not only understand electronics very well, but can communicate your knowledge with a clearly drawn representation.

A good schematic is a work of art for those that can appreciate it.

Regards
Vortex1 / ION

Dear Vortex/ION

Thank you for the drawing complement. Now if we can just fill in all the components that go into those driver boxes.

Spokane1

[TinselKoala]

Where common sense cuts to the core (no pun intended):

All probe skewing and Clark-Hess glitches aside, I still would have liked to see a $20 "Kill-A-Watt" meter on the AC mains side of his device. With a claimed 5x or more gain in power, surely we could have looked at mains Watts in and Watts out (even guestimating the automobile lamp wattage by brightness) and had a much better reading on the veracity of the claim. Why this was not done speaks volumes.

I find it hard to believe that his main supply and driver circuit would be soaking up so much power that it would mask the gain, and furthermore, if it required such a dissipative circuit in order to work, of what use is it?

Is anybody getting my drift?

Oh, I get your drift all right.

Look at the statements being used to promote and sell the DVD.   Your Kill-A-Watt meter on the AC mains is designed to tell you the input power "that you paid for", right?

This year, Graham Gunderson showed the Magnetic Implosion Transformer that he invented and it measured out at 570% more output than the input he paid for!

(emphasis in the original)

As a matter of fact, he can dial the input down until it goes negative,  which means the COP (coefficient of performance) is infinite!  Coefficient is the ratio between desired work done in a system compared  to the work that we have to pay for.

(emphasis mine)

http://www.energeticforum.com/291117-post1.html

Correct me if I am wrong, but there have been no measurements that I have seen of the "input he paid for",  or rather that somebody has to pay for,  which would be the input from the AC mains to any and all power supplies used to run the device. 

[ramset]

HHmmm
You would be a ruff guy to work for..."are we there yet"?

Not yet ...gotta get all this business on the front end sorted so we can cut down the "payments"  to the "black box" [where the magic happens]
Apparently that will be the easy part ....if the COP figure holds true ..??

[Dog-One]

I believe Graham stated his device extracts between 6 to 8 watts of useable power and the COP can be set to infinity by just the twist of a pot.

Keep a look at http://perpetua.green/ for when he begins to post his complete disclosure.