Graham Gunderson's Energy conference presentation Most impressive and mysterious

[Spokane1]

Spokane1
Dear All,
Here is a drawing of the Synchronous Diode Component Layout to help facilitate discussions about this sub assembly.
Enjoy!

[lancaIV]

The risc of false/wrong measurements by "eye/instruments" about light sources as Output-Wattage
indicators :
http://google.com/patents/WO2015157722A1?cl=en

Part of the crux of this invention is that the detection timing of human visual process, as well as the measurement speed of light with LUX meters, react too slow to average the light intensities produced by various high frequencies pulsed current duty cycles. At these frequencies, regardless of the duty cycle percentage, the LUX meter, and more importantly human physiology, sees the light as a constant illumination rather than dimmed. Thus pulse width dimming at these frequencies, while it actually exists, is not perceived much and can only be measured by the fastest light metering devices.


https://www.google.com/patents/US5130608
The network according to my present invention generates a train of pulse waves of extremely narrow pulse width. These pulses are amplified and directed into a fast switching power transistor. When the power transistor conducts the pulse train, current flows through the load for a time interval equal to the pulse width which may be measured in nanoseconds or microseconds. Since the useful energy is expended mainly during the pulse width but not during the resting period between pulses, which is relatively much larger than the pulse width, yet too short to be perceptible to the human eye, considerable energy can be saved while nevertheless maintaining brightness of illumination.
In other words, the light-producing ultra short DC pulses are selected sufficiently close in sequence (say 4,000 pulses per second) to prevent the human eye because of its natural retentivity, to discern the intervening resting or nonpulsed periods as shadows. As is well-known in the lighting art, fluorescent light is perceived continuous at 60 cycles AC per second, which is above the time-resolving ability of the eye or critical fusion frequency (CFF). Another- benefit on my present invention is to increase the longevity of incandescent load resistor elements.


In one example, the module circuit is adjusted to produce 4,000 pulses per second with a pulse width of about 10  microseconds (with an average resting interval of about 240 microseconds), a load of 100 ohms, and a charging potential of 100 volts. Using Ohm's Law, these conditions would produce 100 watts of peak power. Using Equation I, the average power in the Example 1 can thus be calculated, i.e., about 4 watts. Assuming that the power dissipated in the module itself is approximately 8 watts, the total average energy consumed is the sum of energy expenditure due to load and energy dissipated in the working module, namely a grand total of about 12 watts.

Clearly, the average power consumed in the pulsed incandescence of a light bulb under the control of the inventive module of this example is as low as almost one-tenth the amount consumed in a conventional AC power supply for an incandescent light bulb.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flicker_fusion_threshold

about  MEG  patent-grant ability :
from Paul Galey
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=fr_EP&FT=D&date=19761217&CC=FR&NR=2312135A1&KC=A1
to "Citing documents"

Luis Ramon Suarez
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=4&adjacent=true&locale=fr_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadoc?CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20070201&DB=&locale=fr_ch                       DEFINITIVE PROTECTION


About MEG and system free available energy :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=BE&NR=1018711A3&KC=A3&FT=D&ND=5&date=20110705&DB=EPODOC&locale=fr_EP
Pour de petites puissances de 25 à 40 kilowatts/jour, les gains moyens oscilleront de 18 à 20 %. Par contre, pour des puissances supérieures à 100 kW/jours, les gains moyens pourront, en principe, vite atteindre plus de 25 %.

These values are similar this one :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=17&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=fr_EP&FT=D&date=19860717&CC=DE&NR=3501076A1&KC=A1
Wenn in Anlehnung  an bisherige Wechselhysteresetheorien (siehe anfangs) in eine 500 g schwere Ferritmagnetplatte bei einer Zyklenfrequenz von 5000 Hz etwa 25 kW "hinein-  fliessen", so ergibt sich bei einem angenommenen Wandlerwirkungsgrad von 20% als sekundär entnommen eine Leistung von 5 kW.   

500g Ferritmagnet for 5 KW power output(Frequency dependance,here 5 KHz) comparing with the offered details about  Paul Galeys static generator :
Pour chaque dispositif d'une puissance de 2 kW en courant alternatif 220 volts,50 hertz par exemple,utilisant des aimants ferrites courants,il faudrait environ 75 grammes d'aimant.

[k4zep]

Spokane1
Dear All,
Here is a drawing of the Synchronous Diode Component Layout to help facilitate discussions about this sub assembly.
Enjoy!

Beautiful work S1!  Maybe this can get us back on track!

Ben K4ZEP

[verpies]

The real question is to understand what is going on in the Synchronous Diode section.  Do you happen to know what the upper limit of leakage power might be from a FET gate to the source-drain current path?

There is no upper limit since the current flowing due to the MOSFET's Gate Leakage is proportional to the voltages & frequencies appearing between the gate and drain terminals.  Fore example, the reactance of a 500pF capacitance @ 1MHz is 318Ω.

If you have the drain swinging by 600V with respect to the gate, then the instantaneous power transfer across that 318Ω reactance will be 1131W.
If that 600V swing happens only 0.5% of the total cycle time, then the average power transferred by that capacitive reactance will be 5.6W.


P.S.
The Miller's capacitance decreases as the gate drain voltage increases.

[k4zep]

There is no upper limit since the current flowing due to the MOSFET's Gate Leakage is proportional to the voltages & frequencies appearing between the gate and drain terminals.  Fore example, the reactance of a 500pF capacitance @ 1MHz is 318Ω.

If you have the drain swinging by 600V with respect to the gate, then the instantaneous power transfer across that 318Ω reactance will be 1131W.
If that 600V swing happens only 0.5% of the total cycle time, then the average power transferred by that capacitive reactance will be 5.6W.


P.S.
The Miller's capacitance decreases as the gate drain voltage increases.

But with the transformer action dropping the voltage to about 12-20 VAC, what is the value then??  The transformer is not 1/1!  Transfer is in the mw range.

Ben K4ZEP