Solid-State-Generator Ideas

[guest1289]

Solid-State-Generator Ideas

     Just using this thread to type some ideas.
_________________
 
     Compression

     The people at this site are Obviously aware of the concept of 'compression',     for example,    if you totally cover a length of conducting-wire with   'Ferrite-Beads'  then you would hopefully force the  electromagnetic-field  back into the wire,  with the aim of trying to increase the voltage?/ohms?/amperes?  in that circuit,  and maybe even aim for overunity.

     I don't actually know what the results of this idea would be.

     But I thought of some very simple ways to test this  theory/concept,   they are  :

      ( 1 ) -  Place  a  Very-thin-Aluminium-Foil-Ring  in between  two  Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets ,    which are wider than the  aluminium-foil-ring,  so as to cover it completely.
         And somehow feed current to the aluminium-foil-ring only.
         Then measure the difference of the current,  with,  and without the  Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets.
            -  Maybe there would be a way of embedding the whole circuit including  battery and  current-measuring-device  inside  a  hollowed out part of the  ring-magnets,   WITH THE AIM OF COMPRESSING ALL THE ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD OF THE ENTIRE CIRCUIT AND COMPONENTS,   TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO  ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD LEAKAGE,  in case its possible that a lot of electromagnetic-field  can escape from any part of the circuit which is not compressed,  if it needs to do that to stay in keeping with the laws of physics and not cause overunity power production.

      ( 2 ) - My second idea is very similar to number ( 1 ),  but it is that while a  Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  is being made and magnetized,     a  ring-of-aluminium-wire  is placed inside the  Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  while the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  is still in a liquid state.
                So when the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is magnetized as part of it's manufacturing process,  the  ring-of-aluminium-wire  will not become magnetized because it is aluminium ( aluminium cannot be magnetized ).
                And put current in the aluminium-ring,   via the ideas in method number ( 1 ) .
                This method would completely cover the aluminium,  unlike method number ( 1 ),  because in that method it's possible that  electromagnetic-field could escape from even the micrometer thickness of the  aluminium-foil  sandwiched  in between the 2 ring-magnets.

                So I'm thinking that if electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the uncovered circuit,  it will do that,  to avoid producing overunity power generation.
               

[guest1289]

     Making this new post,    instead of editing my last post,   so as not to affect the  time-stamp  of my previous post some minutes ago.
_______

     For all I know  successful  solid-state-overunity-generators may already exist,  and sitting on some members desks while they type.
     Referring to  historical-devices,  and claims by some members on this site.
_______

     I had the idea of a self-running-solid-state-device made of coils( bifilar, or pancake, or others ),  and using cores,  iron or maybe even permanent-magnet-cores,   the idea being that one core affects another core,  and there's something like an eternal wobble to and fro between the 2 or more cores,  and these field movements are somehow amplified by the coils.
     (  I assume this is the general idea of many devices that have been around for a long time  )
     Thinking about it,   not only specific designs of coils would be the secret to a successful overunity device like this,   could the secret also be  permanent-magnets  or  permanent-magnet-cores,   since it's proven that magnets  can do work.
      And  'compression' in my previous post,   could also have been the secret of some of these devices,  in the coils or cores.
_______

     This may or may not be relevant to this thread.

     I recently just realized( or remembered ? ) that a method of  'Magnetic-Shielding' is to actually use  'Permanent-Magnets'.
     For example,  if you want to shield a 5cm x 5cm x 5cm ceramic-magnet cube,  you might use a 1-cm x 5cm x 5cm ceramic-magnet sheet,  to at least partially shield it,  or thats what I'm thinking .
       I'm typing this because I read that they use  permanent-magnets  as  magnetic-shields  for some very large and powerful professional devices.
_______

       I have been thinking of some imaginative names for some of my  electric-motor designs,  so I thought of the following  :
       -  The  Put-Paul-##thers-Into-The-Legal-Custody-Of-##izabeth-##thers-Electric-Motor 
       -  The  Surely-A-Picture-Of-That-Person-Spending-All-Afternoon-And-Evening-Sitting-At-That-Corner-Establishment-With-That-Emblem-On-It's-Banner-Would-be-A-Priceless-Picture-Electric-Motor         
       -  The  Why-Doesn't/Can't-Buddy-Number-2( ######actor-Critter )-And-Or-Paul-And-Or-#, -Go-Down-And-Drink-With-That-Person-Down-At-That-Corner-Establishment-With-That-Emblem-On-It's-Banner,-Or-At-Least-Just-######actor-Critter-And-Or-Paul, -Electric-Motor
     

[guest1289]

     Compression

     The people at this site are Obviously aware of the concept of 'compression',     for example,    if you totally cover a length of conducting-wire with   'Ferrite-Beads'  then you would hopefully force the  electromagnetic-field  back into the wire,  with the aim of trying to increase the voltage?/ohms?/amperes?  in that circuit,  and maybe even aim for overunity.

     I don't actually know what the results of this idea would be.

     But I thought of some very simple ways to test this  theory/concept,   they are  :

      ( 1 ) -  Place  a  Very-thin-Aluminium-Foil-Ring  in between  two  Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets ,    which are wider than the  aluminium-foil-ring,  so as to cover it completely.
         And somehow feed current to the aluminium-foil-ring only.
         Then measure the difference of the current,  with,  and without the  Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets.
            -  Maybe there would be a way of embedding the whole circuit including  battery and  current-measuring-device  inside  a  hollowed out part of the  ring-magnets,   WITH THE AIM OF COMPRESSING ALL THE ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD OF THE ENTIRE CIRCUIT AND COMPONENTS,   TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO  ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD LEAKAGE,  in case its possible that a lot of electromagnetic-field  can escape from any part of the circuit which is not compressed,  if it needs to do that to stay in keeping with the laws of physics and not cause overunity power production.

      ( 2 ) - My second idea is very similar to number ( 1 ),  but it is that while a  Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  is being made and magnetized,     a  ring-of-aluminium-wire  is placed inside the  Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  while the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet  is still in a liquid state.
                So when the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is magnetized as part of it's manufacturing process,  the  ring-of-aluminium-wire  will not become magnetized because it is aluminium ( aluminium cannot be magnetized ).
                And put current in the aluminium-ring,   via the ideas in method number ( 1 ) .
                This method would completely cover the aluminium,  unlike method number ( 1 ),  because in that method it's possible that  electromagnetic-field could escape from even the micrometer thickness of the  aluminium-foil  sandwiched  in between the 2 ring-magnets.

                So I'm thinking that if electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the uncovered circuit,  it will do that,  to avoid producing overunity power generation.
             

      I made a mistake in stating   'Ferrite-Beads'  in that post,   instead of stating  'Ferrite-Beads',   I should have stated  Ring-Magnets.
      (   I thought that   'Ferrite-Beads'  are in fact  Ring-Magnets ,  but it seems I was wrong.
           https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_bead                                                                      )

       So I should have typed  Ring-Magnets,  not  'Ferrite-Beads' .

       (    Note :  Although I want  'Ferrite-Beads'  replaced with   Ring-Magnets  in that post,   I notice that  ferrite-beads are on the very long-thin cables for laptops etc,  and if these cables carry  dc-current  then there would be some loss over the length of these long-thin cables,  I don't suppose it's possible that they're also acting as a mild  current  booster/amplifier( overunity ).       
              Even though they are not actually  permanent-magnets, the current may make them temporary-magnets  or  electromagnets,   and members on this site have said that  ferrite-metals have the ability to 'remember'  current-directions  or whatever,   when they were talking about their  coils ( don't know if their coils were actually made of ferrite-metals ) 

[guest1289]

     A distraction from  'Compression'

    I'm stating the obvious below,  but I was never interested in the effect below,  because back then,  before commonly available internet,   it was impossible to  research  overunity devices etc etc,  so I never really noticed the  following effect properly,  and especially not since I never built anything  relevant enough etc.

     It's  very  possible that the  secret  of past devices( like Figuera's device,  and others )  was the following :

     "Electromagnets are usually in the form of iron core solenoids. The ferromagnetic property of the iron core causes the internal magnetic domains of the iron to line up with the smaller driving magnetic field produced by the current in the solenoid. The effect is the multiplication of the magnetic field by factors of tens to even thousands."

      "The effect is the multiplication of the magnetic field by factors of tens to even thousands."

      Is that  'Effect'   not a  very  definition  of  free-energy / overunity,  I don't know what the trade-offs are for that effect,  I don't have enough knowledge about current  etc.

      However,  I'm sure it is not difficult to design all sorts of designs to optimize that  'effect',  to create a self-runner .

       That quoted text is from the  webpage page  below  :

        http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/elemag.html

        (  strangely,  now it is often not possible to load the above webpage    )

        A design that instantly occurred to me was lots and lots  flat-money-coin-shaped  cores  with some sort of wire around them ,  and each one induces a current in a corresponding  non-contact  ( secondary )  coil ( with or without core ),  but I haven't fully thought through the design.

        (  Actually,  although I assume electromagnets function via  steady non-pulsed dc-current,  I haven't fully confirmed it on my web-searches   )

-----------

        The  following may be a  very  slight   side-track,  from the basic  'free-energy'  effect of the  electromagnet,  since it mentions certain frequencies and resonance ,  or it may be directly relevant.

        The following mentions that the  electromagnet  draws it's extra energy from the environment.
           Search for the text    "can exceed"   in the following webpage  :
              http://www.energeticforum.com/archive/index.php/t-11259.html

        And below is  a  Google-Image-Search  link for an image in the above webpage,  which cannot be accessed via any other way other than  google-image-search  :

        https://www.google.es/search?q=%22http://i50.tinypic.com/vdjwpt.jpg%22&biw=1024&bih=485&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBzLWd1oXQAhXGuhoKHUkMB1AQ_AUIBigB

-----------

[guest1289]

.
   
  I found the following concept on another forum,   and it seems to fit in with things I have posted,  although the things I posted were concerning induction in  electric-motors.

   I am typing it using my own wording,  rather than just posting quoted text.

   A  2-Amp Input Light-Bulb,  Will Output Exactly 2-Amps,  It Uses Up No Energy,  Exactly The Same Energy Is Used Up If It Was Just A Closed Loop With 'No'  Light-Bulb . 
   (  I don't know if this refers to AC or DC ? )

   They also stated that you can use the input electricity,  to generate electricity,  but didn't detail or mention anything about overunity.

    And -  The Energy Depleted in The Battery In The Above Scenario,  Is Completely As A Result Of 'Shorting' The Battery',  And The Chemical Change Resulting From 'Shorting' The Battery'
    (  In the 2 lines above, I am expanding upon what I read on another forum  )
       
_________

    Using A Shape To Obtain A  Moving  Magnetic-Field  From A Non-moving Permanent-Magnet
        I had read a theory that the  gigantic hexagon on  saturn,    occurs because it is the most efficient shape for the  fluid-dynamics( gas ) in those circumstances.
         Wondering if maybe this, or another shape,  could be used to invoke the opposite function,  that is to create  moving  magnetic-fields  purely  from  ( non-electric ) non-moving  permanent-magnets.
          (  Yes,  many people accept  that  the  magnetic-field  of a permanent-magnet  does not  rotate with the magnet (  farday's-paradox ),   so I'm not sure how my idea fits in with farday's-paradox  )
_________

    The  Concept of Very Fast  Discharging And Charging Of Multiple Capacitors In A Circuit,  To Try And Achieve Overunity
      -  To me,  this could force the   capacitors ?,     to extract  electromotive-force( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromotive_force ) ,  Or,  Aether,  from their surrounding space ( air, vacuum ? ) ,  to keep the electrical current flowing,  or,  to maintain the  'ratio'  of  drifting-electrons/electromotive-force  in the current in balance,   Or,   just to maintain the  'ratio'  of  Non-drifting-electrons/electromotive-force  in the  materials  in balance.

      It seems related to my post below( and to lots of other peoples theories which are similar ) :
          http://overunity.com/16961/aether-drive/msg495704/#msg495704