Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Measuring AC signal with a digital multimeter

Started by ayeaye, October 30, 2016, 07:58:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

verpies

If the meter's manual states "averaging" then it is not very likely that the marketing people would write that instead of boasting about the TrueRMS feature which requires an expensive multiplier such as the Gilbert cell.

ayeaye

I maybe figured out how it measures in the AC range. I think it has to be some simple algorithm, it doesn't do anything fancy. But it doesn't bother to measure values below zero, it only measures values above zero, assuming that values below zero are a mirror image, like in a perfect sine.

I also measured square waves with different duty cycles. In the DC range they were perfectly the average with the given duty cycle. But in the AC range it appeared to be the peak value, multiplied by how much the duty cycle was greater than 50%. That is, when it was 25%, the values were 0.5 times the peak value, and when it was 75%, it was 1.5 times peak value.

By that i guess what it does in the AC range is, it calculates the squares of the values above zero, multiplies each square by two, then adds them all and divides by the number of all measured values, then takes square root of it. By testing it with more complex signals, it could be found out whether this is indeed what it does. Who does it may post the results here.