Why Over-Unity is Possible

[sm0ky2]

With very weak magnets, you can prove that they do work against gravity over time.


Take a magnet that can barely hold itself up on a steel ceiling
And watch it.
Over some time, gravitational acceleration wins and the magnet falls.


If it did no work, why does it stay up for a few seconds?
If gravity did no work, why does it fall?


Now take a model rocket with a large mass for its' engine.
So that it hangs in the air during the strongest portion of its burn time.
You will see that after a few seconds of 'hovering', gravity wins and starts
drawing the rocket to the ground, even though the rocket is still producing force.


Gravity accelerates at 9.8m/s/s, meaning each second in the air adds another 9.8m/s
when these two forces balance, the rocket stays still.
There is no motion, but rest assured
work is being done by the rocket fuel.
And by gravity
As you see a second or two later, the rocket begins to move downward.


The same thing happens with magnetism when the paramagnetic bond-energy is
lower than a materials constant, derived from the materials specific gravity and the
strength of magnetization, using a Langevin transformation.


this 'magnetic density' constant, divided by the magnets volumetric displacement
gives the field strength as a function of distance from the center of magnetism.
This is a timeless force function


Gravity is time-dependent


by combining the two, using the induction properties of the steel, we find the duration
of time the magnet will hang.


When magnetic field strength is greater than this 'magnetic density' constant,
gravitational acceleration is countered by induction in the steel.
And in this scenario, the work done by gravity is on the steel ceiling, not the magnet.
Work done by the magnet only happens one time, at the time of induction.
(I.e. approaching the steel with the magnet)


Using an electromagnet on the same ceiling, we find the energy to be a function
of the bond-energy of the crystalline structure, in the form of the induction
constant (which for steel begins at ~ 1150 kg*m^2/s^2A^3)
notice there is a 3rd dimension here (volume, not just area)


by decreasing current through the electromagnet, we can observe the field strength
at which gravity becomes important.
And again, we observe gravity doing work against the magnetic force.
And this is again, a function of time.


This is but one of many tests we can perform to prove that magnetism is a time-less force.
3 dimensions


Gravity exists in 4-d spacetime

[blueplanet]

The term overunity can be very misleading.
Energy harvesting is probably a more acceptable term.
The former implies that the energy can come from nowhere. The latter means that there is a source of energy to harvest.

[sm0ky2]

The term overunity can be very misleading.
Energy harvesting is probably a more acceptable term.
The former implies that the energy can come from nowhere. The latter means that there is a source of energy to harvest.

The implications come from a misconception of what "energy" is.
And also how we use it.
We have not discovered a "nothing" or a "anywhere" that energy does not exist.
Energy is everywhere that humans have access to.




The arguments against overunity come from one theory.
A theory which cannot be proven, but has been disproven time and time again.


Yet science still insists on calling this theory a set of "laws".
For clearly economic purposes, and reasons of acedemic prestige.


For thermodynamic theory to hold true, we require a zero-thermal energy state.
Which we don't have. Nor do we have a truly isolated system.


Currently the theory claims a zero-energy state to exist at 0 Kelvin.
But we have disproven this by lowering the temperature of samples below 0K.
And we still find that there exists atomic motion and quantum fluctuations.


To understand this, we must use the theory itself.
Take an isolated system at thermal equilibrium.
There is no potential for thermal energy flow, therefore no perceived change
in internal energy.
Because the system is isolated, there is no external thermal reference.
Simply put, we have no way of knowing the real temperature.
In a non-isolated system we can use gravity or some other source to
determine a thermal energy quantity, but if the system is truly isolated,
we have no reference.
No potential for thermal energy flow. But does the system contain some
quantity of "energy"?


Of course we assume that if the system has any temperature above 0K
there is some absolute value of thermal energy contained within.
But what is this value? To know that, we must know the absolute temperature.
The Kelvin scale was broken, so the only (temporary) solution is to develop a
new scale, to convert -Kelvins to the new zero.
This could occur an infinite number of times, Kelvin, Marvin, Gavin........
And at the end of our journey, we will find the thermal state of our existence
to be some astronomically high value beyond our ability to conceptualize what
"absolute zero" truly is.


This problem lies at the very foundations of thermodynamic theory.
Without a known zero-state, the theory is open to negative energy values.
Negative energy is the same as energy. The theory doesn't actually work.


It holds true in most cases, because we exist in a high-entropy environment.
This does not mean that the opposite cannot exist.


In fact, for any of this to exist, at some point, negentropy must have occurred
or still be occurring, "somewhere". (what caused the 'big bang'?)


Whether you subscribe to BB theory, or the theory that our universe exists in
a constant state of flux, negentropy is an essential function.


In this field of research we are Orville and Wilbur.
While the rest of the world would be perfectly content stuck on the ground of
their flat-earth, destroying truth and knowledge, so we can do this all over
again in a few thousand years.

[blueplanet]

Even at absolute zero temperature, electric current flow without any source. This appears to be an obvious bleach of the 2nd law.

[sm0ky2]

Even at absolute zero temperature, electric current flow without any source. This appears to be an obvious bleach of the 2nd law.

That is exactly what Maxwell predicted, even long before we created a superconductor
Resistance is a function of heat.
With no heat, there is no resistance.