TD replications

[ARMCORTEX]

Nonlinear, so you say ferromagnetism and gravity is the same. I would not agree with that. There is a certain basic understanding of magnets, the fridge magnet level. But the longer you really observe and investigate magnetism, the more you'll see that there's more to it.
The fact that we used Teslas design without to improve it for over 100 years shows, how closedminded the establishment really is. Who would finance development of energy-efficient machines when energy is the most lucrative economy in the world? And as soon as something is against the establishment, any pro will drop it immediately. Which is why there are up to this day incredibly simple ways to violate the law of energy conservation, completely unnoticed by mainstream science.


I asked this elsewhere too, please explain me the following:
a certain exact DC pulse on a coil will repell the coil further away from a PM, the stronger thw PM is. Where does that additional energy come from?

You are an idiot, if it was simple I would have seen it, I have watched this forum since 2009.

If it was simple, I would not see the same old gang try russian coils for 5 years now on the Kapanadze forum.

I am ready to say, almost impossible, extremely difficult, and now even more so as the misinformation machine is fully oiled and greasy.

John Bedini was a fraud, the guy did not achieve OU.

And this device was stupid to begin with, another plywood idea from gotoluc. If only a nice build was done in metal, with gearing a precision made CAM to get the timing right

But its always the idiots way of making things, wood, no precision, no design research, no machine shop quotes.

A bunch of silly ass talking idiots wankin around instead of giving money to gotoluc so that we can definitly cross out that idea.

They will however talk their ass off as soon as they see it might not be working, what have you proposed that is better than gotoluc?

Nothing... What have you done? Nothing... Talkers, not walkers... Gotoluc at least is a walker, texas ranger.

Fucking  ass lemmings dont even help gotoluc, the man should not even help you  assholes anymore.

[Cairun]

Nonlinear,

Well, you fellas don't get it, do you? I'm fully aware that Luc's magnet arrangement is slightly different than the original of Floor. It absolutely does not matter along which path you move or twist the two magnets in relation to one another, they still behave like a system of passive and conservative springs. If the force is greater in one direction, then the path to travel will be shorter, and vice versa. If you accurately measure and correctly integrate the total work, you will see that there is no overunity. Not in Floor's design, not in Luc's design, not in Joe's, Fred's, and Julie's designs, not in anybodies designs of purely passive permanent magnet systems.

It is because we can see the profound difference between and potential of Floor's and Luc's designs that we continue with our support.
Minor differences in a design can mean the difference between a working product and a failed product.  Maybe you are unable to see the difference or you simply refuse to see the difference.


I believe your intentions at an earlier time were good, so please stop with the defamation of Floor and Luc and provide constructive criticism instead.  Perhaps, you think that your earlier input was not well received, but Floor and Luc can only do so much at any given time.  They are offering their knowledge to the public without asking for anything in return, deliberate deception will not amount to any gain for them.

If the readers can read between the lines, know some physics, and observe the actions and reactions of the participants, then they will be able to see what I mean. But, if one is a staunch believer in crackpottery, and despite my warnings still believes there is 60% overunity in this system, then he should build the machine himself, and wake up to the reality the hard way.

It is a good suggestion that anyone able should experiment themselves to see if an idea will work or not.
I will certainly conduct independent measurements to verify Luc's measurement results.


Regards,
Alex

[Floor]

@ Cairun

Nice concept / design...very nice.

   thanks for sharing

               floor

[Floor]

@ Gotoluc

    I think you / we have done...  really a superior job, especially given that the experiments
and presentations have been done on the fly, and in a public forum as well !

As far as I am aware of, and as of this point in time...

             ALL points of have been well covered by us without our objection
                       in terms of the full ....

presentation of the devices used
presentation of the methods of measurement
presentation of the mathematics used
answering all posed questions with our goal.... the legitimate satisfaction by the questioner.

We have acknowledged all of the apparent dead ends with out dispute.
We have openly discussed all advice and all suggested approaches to
our processes.
We have pursued and achieved significant improvement in the designs.

And at this point we are about to make some real progress in terms of
coming to a clear and valid determination of a margin of error.

This was the point we had at already arrived at and were preparing for
by GotoLuc's larger build (before the recent flaming outbreaks).  no big deal

Greater forces and greater displacement, can give a greater precision and
reduce the margin of error.

   wow... its all, still intact, still progressing     and still its amazing.....

                              cheers !
                                    floor

[gotoluc]

Hi Floor and everyone

Over the weekend I setup a scale measuring apparatus to the v.2 magnet torque amplifier as I was getting way under unity from the generators output.
After 10 hours of detailed scale samples and calculations to my surprise the input force for one cycle is exactly the same as the output force
It was hard the believe since the first model sowed around 60% gain. So this morning I decided to re-measure the first device with the most care to details.
Now the first device is showing a 10% gain which could be caused by accumulative errors from the 5 gram resolution scale.
What I found could of cause the 60% gain error is by using a different input rotor magnet then the one used for the 11mm output.
I check the rotor magnets and found they have different magnetization force. So most likely that's what happened plus the scale resolution problem.

Sorry but looks like this configuration also has no gain.

Not a big loss (other then time) as the v.2 costs were the magnets and sliders $90. and I can still use them on other experiments.

Kind regards

Luc