Magnet force shield

[lancaIV]

I think for myself that the "nature designer" wires the electro-magnetic movement a little more complex :

only shielding of two magnets does not mean output >1

question 1 : Richard Fradella generator description            "nominal" RPM relation-factor
                  1000 RPM nominal = 1000 W
                    500 RPM                  125 W                          0,5 x 0,5 x 0,5 = 0,125
                    100 RPM                      1 W                          0,1 x 0,1 x 0,1 = 0,001

rotation for itself does not mean research target success
a "shielded" motor-generator rotating could be in sum 3% efficient (Hermann Thoene) or less

fixed rotation or variable speed device ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
question 2 : Mukherjee generator
                   generator given F=BiL in VA
                   1/2 counter-BiL-force= 1/2 V x 1/2 A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How is the wished "duty cycle" in this "permanent magnet idea" Magnet_image.png above applied as part of a push&pull (JLNaudin) process ? Not only the air gap is important !

The "duty cycle" controlling is torque-given !
controle: Frequency/Time/Function in one device

btw: "shielding/neutralizing" counterpart is amplifying

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Flynn Bro. did also applied for a coil-wrapped permanent magnet,as magnetic force-shield
or magnetic force amplifier 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://overunity.com/17119/pulling-energy-from-the-ambient-energy-field-using-a-coil-capacitor/msg519030/#new
Reply#211
...
From theory point of view there should exist a power of four relation between the coil capacitor's capacitance (C) and the amount of induced charge in the charge collecting capacitor per cycle. This is because there occur two rate of changes. First happens in magnetic to energetic induction that creates the energetic current flow and the second in DC conversion which is done by energetic to electric induction as energetic component changes direction between two unequal magnetic field potentials. So when C is increased two times the amount of induced charge should be increased sixteen times.
.............

[Floor]

@Norman

Butch LaFonte's work helped to inspire me to.

"just want to see it like priest in the temple was satisfied when he saw Jesus."

             Yea, me to
                         

                 Here is the latest video
                                     http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q

                           I've seen the light

[Floor]

@LankaTV

QUOTE
"How is the wished "duty cycle" in this "permanent magnet idea" Magnet_image.png above
applied as part of a push&pull (JLNaudin) process ? ENDQUOTE

I Don't know.  There are drawings of linking multiple Twist drive units as well as
various other magnet configurations in some of my other topics.
Sorry I'm too tired to look those up for you today.

QUOTE
Not only the air gap is important !" END QUOTE

I havent tried this with a larger shield magnet yet (instead of two magnets clamped together)
but only with a smaller and single magnet.

I  don't think an air gap between the two shield magnets is needed.

QUOTE
"shielding/neutralizing" counterpart is amplifying"  END QUOTE

Yes its something like a magnetic transister or triode vecuum tube.
                       
                   regards
                       floor

[Floor]

@ all viewers

These three videos are the ones most directly related to / demonstrating this over unity process.

  http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x59r978
  http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5an8hd
  http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q

         Do something good with this
                    floor

[Floor]

@ all readers

Some of the drawings depict interactions in which the outer magnets are in
                           REPULSION
when the inner magnet / magnets are removed.

Others of the drawings depict interactions in which the outer magnets are in
                          ATTRACTION
when the inner magnet is removed.

The directions in which the inner magnet and/or magnets can be installed and
removed with out work against magnetic forces, are not entirely the same when
work is output through attraction instead of output done by repulsion !

                      floor