Magnet force shield

[norman6538]

CORRECTION  the OU ratio is 4.75. I made a mistake on the spread sheet, sorry.
Much better than I thought.

YEAH Floor,

Norman

[Floor]

@Norman6538

Quote from Norman6538

"I have seen too many well build devices that did not work that were a waste of time ....... "

" ...... I hope to have measurement numbers within a day if not too swamped."

End quote

                                               Understood
...............................................

I have done some tests with the repelling magnets and a stack between, but only
while using wider magnets than in the drawings.


I'm going straight on toward the all-magnet-motor @

                        http://overunity.com/17070/all-magnet-motor-td-based/

I have some of the most difficult to acquire materials for that on hand,
but not all of them.

           I may  be away from the topics for some days.
                               lets keep on it.
                                        floor

[norman6538]

Recent tests show that the magnet stack does not kill all of the repelling force so my measurements are wrong. I can't believe how that magnetic force gets through the magnet stack. One would think if would flow into the flux flow like "current flow" in a stream of water.

Very disappointed.

Norman   

[Floor]

@all readers

          Please find the    "RtAngSld.png"   file below.

                                  floor

[Floor]

@Noirman6835

I think you are one of a mere handful of people on the entire planet,
who has has given the time to actually understand the principles of the
twist drive. (I think ?).

But I'm the one that's feeling slammed at this point.  Think about this please !

Your "disappointment"s are a bad reflection on this topic.

Dude, 
Prove / demonstrate the precision that your test device is capable of delivering.
I expect that I have to prove my devices and so on.  It has to be this way.
                     Show us that device in great detail.
                                        I have to
                    Show us how it functions.
                                        I have to.
                   show the actual methods you use in measuring (in detail).
                                        I have to.
Give clear and detailed explanations.
                                       I have to, or else my observations / claims
                                       are a waste of  the readers time.

Facts are what science is about, whether validating or invalidating. 

Otherwise the posting of the results you are "disappointed" with, are more
detrimental to the topics,  than even if you had either,  posted clear evidence
contradicting my own measurements, or not posted at all.

This is the third time, since I have been associated with you on the O.U. forum
that I have said this to you in one way or another.  It's not a slam, it whats I need
from you, its what a scientific en devour requires.

Your congratulation are not a validation, when / if  people think they are coming
from some one who doesn't really understand the subject any way. 

I think you HAVE understood the magnet interactions. 

My goal is to make it, so that a lot of people have understood them. 

I'm not (in this topic) trying to prove any thing, nor am I looking for
replications per say.  I'm looking toward that 100th monkey, that is all.
I'm guessing that most people understand the "100th monkey thing".

By the way

Congratulations on being monkey number four or five out of many many millions !
               Best wishes
                             floor