Magnet force shield

[truesearch]

Norman,


Maybe I'm not getting the entire picture of what Floor is seeing . . . But what I am able to see is that with his theory of shielding is that you can get two magnets that are repealing each other into very close proximity with very little effort. Then remove the shield (also without much effort), resulting in the 2 magnets to again STRONGLY repeal each other.


>>NOTE: Floor noted this: "inner magnets installation and removal only works correctly when the direction is straight out from and into the page.
So that means to me that the inner "shield" magnet is not up&down but needs to be forward&backward as viewed.

[norman6538]

Yes Truesearch that is exactly what I understood and your drawing shows that.
Thanks, Its a great concept but remember closer stronger and further weaker will
reduce the best/most potential because the repelling magnets will have considerable gap between them.

But what really counts is measurement of the input and output work - mass x distance.
I have had several embodiments that worked very well and there was extra out but
not enough to do the set and reset work so the work out can be repeated.

I wish Floor and all of us the best of luck/research success.
The world needs a better source of power.
But my hopes are diminishing after trying for 15 years and gaining nothing.
Our master Designer has done a very tight job of wireing all of the physics together.


Norman

[Floor]

@Norman6835

Thanks Norman for your observations, input and good questions.

The png file (Magnet_image.png) uploaded by true search is a correct interpretation / representation of
the sequences.    Thank you Truesearch.

QUOTE  from Norman6835
"But what really counts is measurement of the input and output work - mass x distance."
END QUOTE

WORK = FORCE x DISPLACEMANT

Magnitude of (is amount of) force (is push or pull)   times     displacement (is the straight line distance in the direction of the applied force)
equals work.   

Mass,  acceleration rate and inertia are out of the picture at this point in the process.

                     thanks again
                            floor

[Floor]

@norman6835

On a more personal note.
Thanks, your involvement has helped keep me honest about what I have seen
as apposed to what I have sometimes mistakenly only thought I was seeing.
I hope we will continue to hear from you in the future !
                    best wishes
                             floor

[norman6538]

@norman6835

On a more personal note.
Thanks, your involvement has helped keep me honest about what I have seen
as apposed to what I have sometimes mistakenly only thought I was seeing.
I hope we will continue to hear from you in the future !
                    best wishes
                             floor

I'll be around. I have a permanent magnet addiction that has not been cured.
I do learn from others. Butch Lafonte was one who showed lots of setups but never
any measurements. And that triggered me to try lots of things. Again several were
OU but not enough extra to do the switching to make it a self runner.
So I have seen OU but not a self runner. What mystifies me is all those patents out
there that are not on the shelves to buy. I thought Flynn by now would have something but apparently not.

Best of luck to you and all others too.
I'm not in it for money nor ego - just want to see it like priest in the temple was satisfied when he saw Jesus.

Norman