re: energy producing experiments

[Delburt Phend]

 Delburt Phend  youtube

[sm0ky2]

Delburt Phend  youtube

Yes i have watched your hand spun cylinder videos from years ago
I was just wondering, if after all these years,
If you have constructed any type of device that actually verifies your theory?


Or at least a valid test apparatus, which has a consistent initial force and acceleration
which is necessary to accurately perform this type of test?

[sm0ky2]

The problem with doing it that way, you can only observe changes in location,
and a rotational reference with respect to the camera view
at intervals of your camera's framerate:


This has no respect to initial force applied,
or even the direction of acceleration between frames
is it accelerating or decelerating when you count your first frame?
can you even know from that ad-hoc experiment?


The test must be repeatable, and performed with consistent launch every time
spinning by hand gives you no data.


Measuring the difference in rotation and difference in location gives some limited data,
but not enough to derive the energy of the system at any point in time.


further still, when under the influence of gravity, changes in the angle of the cylinder (off vertical) affect the forces imparted onto the system.
This is not accounted for anywhere in your mathematics.
Yet you claim your experimental results match with your faulty math.

[Cloxxki]

Agree with sm0ky2;

I've looked at a few of the short videos, but all I see is added layers of complexity and interactivity of mass without clear claims let alone attempts to measure anything.
Added complexity compels at least equally increased clarity and accuracy.
Or does anyone disagree?

Can you state clearly what proposed principle you are intending to exploit, and how success thereof would be expressed in an experiment?

[sm0ky2]

Agree with sm0ky2;

I've looked at a few of the short videos, but all I see is added layers of complexity and interactivity of mass without clear claims let alone attempts to measure anything.
Added complexity compels at least equally increased clarity and accuracy.
Or does anyone disagree?

Can you state clearly what proposed principle you are intending to exploit, and how success thereof would be expressed in an experiment?

What this is:
Its' a free falling representation of conservation of momentum, that was derived from the Atwood Machine, some time in the 60's-70's and passed through colleges as a thought experiment.
This was tested on board Space Lab by NASA in the 80's and help confirm that momentum is indeed conserved, even in complex systems.


As for exploiting it? All i see are the claims in this thread, with no clear explanation of what exactly is being measured. When all variables are accounted for, momentum is conserved.