Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Searching for Buddy in promising magnet motor Project.

Started by dieter, February 05, 2017, 04:14:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shylo

Hi Dieter, My understanding is very limited, but I find that on my set-up, which puts out AC
that if you input a DC voltage at the point where the AC wave is at zero, this reduces the lenz effect.
Also the input of the DC is used for drive.
My coils are all air core, it might not work with cores.
artv

aether22

Quote from: dieter on February 05, 2017, 04:44:37 PM
Now, this implies, logically, that if I had a magnet that is reducing its field strength, the closer it gets to the coil will reduce instead of increase the field strenght on proximation, and likewise increase the field strength while moving away, or in simple terms, it would be attracted when getting closer and pushed away when already moving away.


Or in even simpler terms: it would be accellerated by the "Lenz Effect"


To be discussed is, whether it is possible to build such a Magnet. In fact, I had some success. No selfrunner, but defnitely reversal of the current flow, pne of the fundamental criteria.


Others are: Inducer must lower the total fieldstrenght when getting closer to the coil, but must retain axial polarity orientation and also a minimum of stength to be affected by the reactive Field at all.


Hi Deiter, sorry your idea won't work.


You see the action of induction is to oppose change, it is like electromagnetic inertia, and if it opposes change here too as it will, it will tact as a brake.


So the induction from a decrease is strength is irrelevant unless we know polarity decreasing, so the permanent magnet flips the polarity along with flipping the action, as such the induction is what happens of a collapse of the opposite polarity doing the opposite thing, as such we wind up right back where we started as each one flips the induced polarity.


John
?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes

dieter

Shylo, thank you, interesting, but you must choose the right DC polarity then, then of course it will drive the rotor. It is an intetesting, although diffrent concept.


Aether22, thank you, with all the respect, it is obvious to me that you don't understand induction, nor what I was talking about. "Polarity decreasing"?
wtf. Anyone who doesn't understand that induction without a polarity flip of the inductor is perfectly possible, at the cost of lower efficiency per cm3, should not post in this thread, thank you.

citfta

Dieter, you are incorrect about current reversing during magnetic field collapse.  I am saying that based on over 50 years experience in electronics.  Here is a link to a thread where we discuss this at length.  If you will take the time to read it, it will help you see what is really going on.  Since you apparently don't want anyone posting that does not agree with you this will be my only post.  I will not get into an argument with you about your mistaken idea.

http://overunity.com/16203/inductive-kickback/

However your idea about changing the magnetic strength of a coil as it approaches and recedes from a magnet may have some interesting effects.  I feel that aspect of your idea is worth pursuing.

Respectfully,
Carroll

tinman

Quote from: citfta on February 06, 2017, 09:58:09 AM
Dieter, you are incorrect about current reversing during magnetic field collapse.  I am saying that based on over 50 years experience in electronics.  Here is a link to a thread where we discuss this at length.  If you will take the time to read it, it will help you see what is really going on.  Since you apparently don't want anyone posting that does not agree with you this will be my only post.  I will not get into an argument with you about your mistaken idea.

http://overunity.com/16203/inductive-kickback/

However your idea about changing the magnetic strength of a coil as it approaches and recedes from a magnet may have some interesting effects.  I feel that aspect of your idea is worth pursuing.

Respectfully,
Carroll

Carroll

I think you are mixed up here.
I do not see any comment by Dieter saying that the current reverses during magnetic field collapse.
What i do see is Dieter saying that the current flow reverses when the magnetic field strength decreases in the inductor-and he is correct.
Inductive kickback,and AC induction are two totally different things,when it comes to current flow.

As a magnet approaches an inductor/ coil,the current will flow in one direction,and when the magnet leaves the inductor/coil,the current will flow in the other direction.


Brad