Exploring Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) as an explanation for the TPU

[Grumpy]

I lost most of, but got this back from Google cache:

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance  (the stimulation of the atoms to resonate)

Read this link carefully and you will understand.

http://www.es.oersted.dtu.dk/~masc/resonance.htm   make sure you play with the animations

Note the LARMOR resonant frequency formula on the web page.
It's all about precession, just like a top.   You apply a bias field (or static magnetic field, lets say in the 'z-axis') and a side field for driving the pheonmena (lets say in the 'y-axis')  and the atoms start to spin their magnetic moment (they are little magnets due to spin) and induce a field orthogonal to the previous two directions, i.e they induce a field in the remaining direction  of 'x-axis'  .   So if we place coils normal to the 'x-axis' we pick up a signal that defies EM coupling, but now I understand why it is.   Very exciting stuff!!    these are my words I put them in italic for emphasis.


So, even if we use NMR, we still need to match our input (driving) coil and output coils with some matching network of resonant elements.  They will now be 90 deg out of phase and we need to think about all this phaseing.

To bad EMDevice departed - he was definitely a searcher (or is he still lurking?)

EDIT:
hmm - what if the molecule's angular velocity achieves speed of light and the excitation keeps pushing them faster?

[Freedomfuel]

Deleted

[sparkman]

Hi Freedomfuel
quote
"Here is why I think that Sparkman is barking up the wrong tree."
unquote

Exactly which tree is it that I'm wrongly barking up. Please clarify. I'm open to being wrong, just want to know what the context is. You didn't state that. I respect your theories.

Thanks

[Freedomfuel]

Hi Freedomfuel

Exactly which tree is it that I'm wrongly barking up. Please clarify. I'm open to being wrong, just want to know what the context is. You didn't state that. I respect your theories.

Thanks

I think that I confused you with EM devices in my post.  I was refering to the idea of nuclear magnetic resonance as a hypothesis for the workings of the TPU. It seems highly unlikely to me since in the laboratory they use a magnetic field up to 10 Teslas.

[MrMag]

I agree with Freedomfeul.
I think that EMdevices realized that he was wrong all along. That is why he deleted his posts.
He just want to help others so they don't follow the wrong path.