The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[nelsonrochaa]

I didn't promise you any money. But once you submit the link to some silent presentations without further explanation, then it's legitimate for us to ask for a better explanation - don't you think? It's indeed your full right to dismiss it - but you shouldn't consider it as a business proposal, because it isn't, desperate the less.

Hi Zephir,
I'm not particularize  you , but i assure to you that some already make real € propose.
What is legitimate in my perspective is , if you are really interested in that circuit  you should replicate them  , is not the small amount of money and time that you will spend in that circuit that will you make more poor , otherwise just ignore like the people you critic almost time, did in past .
I up to you , you are free

cheers

Nelson Rocha

[nelsonrochaa]

Good morning Nelson.

May I ask a simple question regarding your " Mini Radiant Exciter " circuit, schematic posted on the previous page?

I used a commercial " potted " 240/24 0 24 transformer just using one of the 24 volt windings.

It is connected in series from source.

Is it the 240 volt or the 24 volt winding that's in series from the source? As it has been some time since I built it I have forgotten which way I used the transformer.   

I'm thinking of having another look at this.......

Kind regards, Graham.

Hi Graham,
Is the primary side of transformer that is connected ; the transformer i used is 240v x 9v normally  used in a commercial electronic inboard .

wish you the best

Nelson Rocha

[Zephir]

if you are really interested in that circuit  you should replicate them

This is the same story: why I should get really interested about your circuit? What does it so exceptionally? Once you're whining about trolls flooding this forum, you shouldn't also behave like the troll. Once you start to whine, you got ignored this community (on behalf of Akula or whoever else), you should also ask yourself, what did you really submitted to it. You're doing everything for being ignored with no mercy: you want the attention for nothing, just for informal cat & mice game.

You should realize, why we all are visiting this forum: this forum is dedicated for sharing of information, not for its keeping. This forum is dedicated for exploration of overunity, not for its classification. This forum is dedicated for overunity devices, not for another ones. And so on - everyone who things and behaves differently undermines the very purpose of this forum and the very reason of his own existence here. Is it really so difficult to understand it?

[MileHigh]

LOL, the Copernicus theory was real and yet the mainstream science didn't even bother to look at it for another 160 years. The first attempt for replication of overunity in electrical circuit is currently delayed for 145 years (Cook 1871), cold fusion finding 90 years (Panneth/Petters 1926), Woodward drive 26 years, EMDrive 18 years and room superconductivity finding by 45 years. And I'm not even talking about some industrial utilization - only about first serious attempt for replication published in peer-reviewed literature. The findings get accepted only when they add jobs and profit to existing ruling class, once they threaten it (which is typical just for actually breakthrough findings - i.e. not incremental progress), then they get ignored with no mercy. From this perspective, the ignorance of breakthrough findings is rather strict rule, than some socioeconomical anomaly.

The "argument of yours" is most typical pluralistic ignorance fallacy of pathoskeptics: if these findings are real breakthroughs, how is it possible, that nobody is bothered with attempts for their replications?

Oh sure, like when the whole world was shaken up in 1989 when they announced cold fusion and people thought it was legitimate.  It was the biggest news story across the world the day it was announced.

So, no, you can't run a mail order company selling free energy devices and be just like any other business.  If it really was real, it would shake up the entire world.

It's just a con and they are looking for people like you to feed off of and use.

[synchro1]

@Tinselkola,

Where are you Bub? In bed with a hangover?

"The current on charge and discharge would be _infinite_, taking no time, which is what a vertical line means. Infinite slope! A change in charge over +no change in time+" Impossible you say?

You boldly accused me of misunderstanding, misrepresenting and prevaricating: How dare you be so insolent to me you cheap carnival huckster!

Tesla wrote at great length about the infinity of the spark, and spoke of it at conferences with contemporaries like Max Plank and Albert Einstien.

This is the crux of the infinite power of the impulse magnetisem, and not understood by either you or Milehigh!

I supply proof of it in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeJ5wHBpaf4