The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency

[evostars]

"There are only four types of people in the world regarding discovery and invention:
The most common are those who watch and observe, and profit from invention and discovery; are intrigued by its discoveries.
The second most common are those who dissuade others from invention and discovery, and try to prevent them both mentally and
physically from discovery claiming: 'this can lead to nowhere', or 'that course is a dead end, there is nothing there.'
The third most common are greedy and lustful inventors who desire only fame, profit, and acclaim, nothing matters but any angle that
can be exploited to be used to exploit others for their own ends. Discovery is not an ends to these people, only a means to exploit
others.
The fourth, and most rare are those who do not care about the first three types of people; these rare few have a vision or visions and
are hell-bent to uncover the mysteries of the universe, not out of desire for profit or fame or empirical motives, but the only pure,
noble, and righteous intent, that being pure discovery and understanding as its own ends. The expansion of comprehension and wisdom"

+1
Who's quote is that? I've seen it before.
Im guessing, Eric p Dollard

edit: 200th reply!

[citfta]

Carroll:

Freie Energie bald oder sterben!   

Yes!

Although my last name is German and I am half German, I don't speak it, so I had to look that up.  LOL 

[Grumage]

Hmmm.

I see the OU Police are back on the beat.

Better pack up those gadgets and gizmos guys lest you get caught by a Cop>1!

[TinselKoala]

Hmmm.

I see the OU Police are back on the beat.

Better pack up those gadgets and gizmos guys lest you get caught by a Cop>1!

Well, we have seen people on this thread and others, making claims and assertions that are demonstrably wrong and easily refuted, and other wild claims that have no experimental support at all and are at odds with conventional physics. And I'm not talking about Partzman or Nelson here, who indeed belong to different categories.

Would you prefer that these false claims and unsupported "theorizing" go unchallenged and unrefuted, so they can filter down and corrupt the thinking of well-intentioned but naive persons who may not know any better? 

Suppose somebody told you that you could take an old one-lunger, connect it to a flywheel and a generator made from a rewound washing machine motor, and use its output to electrolyze water (with a pinch of pixie dust and a special pulse circuit of course) and run the engine solely from the gas generated? Would you drop everything else you are doing and rush out to your shed and start welding up frames and bolting parts together, and start encouraging others to do the same? Or would you shake your head and make a post or two to point out the fundamental errors in the claim?

[Grumage]

'Twas a bit of light hearted humour, nothing more.

Grab another coffee, it's early where you are!