Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes

[seychelles]

A new magnet motor by LARSKRO.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18h5X2sDZU&feature=iv&src_vid=71vtcl-G4dw&annotation_id=channel%3A58793cbf-0000-2

[ramset]

Seychelles
is he a member here ?
I see a bit different spelling?

he says this


Thanks. The rotor is made up of 8 x 12pcs. 0.3mm transformator iron sheet,  as you see.
The magnets must be adjusted in strength, so transformer sheet iron does not become saturated, otherwise it will not run.
No, batteries or no electric motor at all.



can you invite him here for a respectful discussion?
he does seem to contradict himself in his introduction?

Thx
Chet

[guest1289]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18h5X2sDZU&feature=iv&src_vid=71vtcl-G4dw&annotation_id=channel%3A58793cbf-0000-2

  That  magnet-motor  was apparently,  either  built from plans purchased from  gravityflight,   or,   maybe the person who made the video is the person who supplied the plans to gravityflight

  From what I saw on the video.  I wonder if maybe it is  simply  'broken-symmetry-of-sticky-points' and a  propelling-force,   just like many of my  magnet-motor designs

   - Not sure if I'm correct,  I notice that swirls have been cut into the wooden? disc,  to make  flexible/springy arms,  I wonder if they are really necessary
 
   Obviously( or I assume ) this idea of  'broken-symmetry-of-sticky-points' and a  propelling-force,  goes back many years,  although at this exact moment I can only think of one  magnet-motor( famous, and was patented ) which used the concept,  I wonder if there were more and how far back the concept dates

   An impressive video if it's genuine,  it would be great if  someone could  start a thread especially for this  magnet-motor,  since not everyone will check this  thread ,   however,  keep in mind, :
      That magnet-motor  was apparently,  either built from plans purchased from  gravityflight,   or,   maybe the person who made the video is the person who supplied the plans to gravityflight
  ________

guest1289

Is it correct.  that  if you have a   radio-receiver  that has been tuned to be in resonance  with a   specific-radio-transmitter  that the  radio-receiver  will bend the  radio-waves  trajectories  in order to draw them into the  receiver,   

  Obviously I was wondering if people have devices that get  free-energy from radio-station-broadcasting-towers etc,  things that get more energy and work further away than  fluorescent-tubes
   (  And I assume this is different to what people who had  high-power-electrical-grid-towers  on their land used to do,   they would bury electrical-cable  around the tower to get  free-energy from the tower via inductance )

   I did not find  any  proven or replicated  experiments to confirm this works( referring to the concept/concepts  on     http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html     )

   If there's any reputable youtube videos ,  please post links

   ( It seems that this is,  or may be how  'Tesla's Power Receiver' worked,  and also,  reading Dollard's work is maybe too difficult for me )

   The link below is the most solid material,  or written in the most understandable terminology,  I have found to date on this concept :

   http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html

   However,  keep in mind, that there seems to be 2 different  concepts in this topic :
     ( 1 ) - You emit a radio-signal( same amplitude and frequency, but offset phase,   as the target  radio-signal), to funnel the  radio-signal from the  target-transmitter into your device to  gain  the energy
     ( 2 ) - Your equipment funnels in the  radio-signal from the  target-transmitter by a method other than 'emitting a radio-signal'  ,   so your device can gain the energy,  I assume this would be the most difficult method 

      Regarding method  '( 2 )' ,  I think the following text in that webpage describes a method to achieve it :
   
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html

This is not "radio," where wavelength is the same size as the components. This is "circuitry", where wavelength is huge, and circuits are small, and the antenna operation more resembles "AC wiring" rather than "EM radiation."

     If that  quoted-text  above does not describe a method to achieve method  '( 2 )',  I know that it is in that webpage because I had found it there a week or two ago,  however,  now I can't specifically remember where in that page it describes it.
      -  I thought it was in the  'updates' on that page,  now I can't remember or be sure where on that page it was

     Tesla had stated somewhere  that the  source of the energy from his overunity? invention( was it one of his inventions related to this ) was  not  'electromagnetic' ,   that makes me wonder if the source of the energy from his overunity? invention  was  'gravity',   that his  Solid-State-?  invention converted gravity to electricity,   
        -  Is it possible he visually confirmed this by observing an  anti-gravity-effect

    And, if a  radio-receiver-device was to be  funneling energy from a  radio-transmitter-device as described on  http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html  ,    would there be a physical pulling force between them,    for-example,     if the  receiver-device   and  transmitter  were on free-floating boats,  would  they move toward each other,   either like an artificial version of gravity,    or,   as a possible alternate explanation of how gravity works,   if so,   then could this be an idea for producing  anti-gravity

     

[dieter]

The only thing like that I know from Tesla is his "Magnifying Transmitter" Patent. Professor Turtur tried to replicate it, but stated the gain is in the 1000th of the actual sender energy, and, Turtur has problems with his reputation. But then again, being a professor researching in the OU field does ruin ones reputation quickly anyway.

[gotoluc]

Seychelles
is he a member here ?
I see a bit different spelling?

he says this


Thanks. The rotor is made up of 8 x 12pcs. 0.3mm transformator iron sheet,  as you see.
The magnets must be adjusted in strength, so transformer sheet iron does not become saturated, otherwise it will not run.
No, batteries or no electric motor at all.



can you invite him here for a respectful discussion?
he does seem to contradict himself in his introduction?

Thx
Chet

Hi Chet,

Larskro wrote this in the videos description box (first thing below video) you need to click show more to see it all.

self running devices are a fake, they CAN´T run. This magnetmotor is a replication of a Gravimag magnetmotor. I want to start a discussion . I am so tired of all the videos that declares - self-running engines, magnetmotors, free energy devices, overunity power, vacuum energy, selfpowering, gravity motors, perpetual motion free energy, etc. - Do not be fooled by these videos. Nothing will work without input of energy. There can never get more energy out than coming in. This is a fact. This is a law of nature. Everlasting machines can never run. Do not waste your time with replications of such things. Sorry for your energy dreams. Free energy comes from the SUN and wind.It is my opinion. Have a good day. Larskro


and in the below comments a youtube user aviatrix2 posted a good explanation of how it works.

He's just spinning the shaft with one finger from below.  Watch him squeeze it tighter when it starts.


A good guess since the shaft is so long

Kind regards

Luc