Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes

[sm0ky2]

I wonder if there's a useful invention there,   an easier more convenient way( in various situations ) to achieve  'Quantum Levitation'

If,  by using your idea,     'Quantum Levitation'( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws6AAhTw7RA ),    could be achieved,    would that prove or disprove  the  'theory of relativity'  regarding constant speed of light

And what about if you implement your idea,  by already using superconductor at the start

Well......  relativisticly speaking,
The electrical signal should be restricted to c
this May manifest as an increase in magnetic field intensity.
Proportional to the rotational velocity.

[sm0ky2]

Maybe a decommissioned MRI machine could be recycled for a cost-effective test

[postingsite]

Maybe a decommissioned MRI machine could be recycled for a cost-effective test

  it seems MRI machine's use liquid-helium( and nitrogen ) for cooling the main electromagnet ( the main source of it's field ),  although,   I assume they do actually also spin some electromagnets

  alternatively,    place some coils on the rim of the outer circle-perimeter  of a  centrifuge( or other spinning component ),    then place an external stator-permanent-magnet to generate current in the coils,     in order to power your idea,     and via your idea     'Quantum Levitation'( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws6AAhTw7RA ) may be achieved

  Although,   I just realized,   that in your idea,  if the current and the wire are both rotating,  then any predicted effect may be nullified,  since they are both rotating

   however,  what if the  'quantum-levitation' effect is solely because of an increased speed of the current

   Also,  I'm not sure if this relates to the Faraday-paradox,  in particular,  the following post :
http://overunity.com/16769/faraday-paradox-revisitedmagnetic-field-rotation-question/msg490265/#msg490265

allcanadian
Re: Faraday paradox revisited,magnetic field rotation question.
« Reply #47 on: August 22, 2016, 09:19:00 AM »

We have three scenario's.


1)only the conductive disk rotates relative to a stationary magnet... a voltage is induced.


2)the conductive disk and magnet rotate together...a voltage is induced.


3)only the magnet rotates... no voltage is induced.


Scenario 2 is unique in that we do not need a conductive disk if the magnet itself is made of conductive material. A magnet rotating on axis will induce an Emf or voltage from center to perimeter or vice versa thus a separate conductive disk is not actually needed.

  Although,  the following post may contravene the assumptions gained from the paradox :
http://overunity.com/16769/faraday-paradox-revisitedmagnetic-field-rotation-question/msg491719/#msg491719

    I have re-read that post,  and it seems correct,  in regard to the paradox,   

[sm0ky2]

Yes they must be supercooled to get them into their superconducting state
But Nibtinol wire is very expensive (niobium-titanium alloy)
So recycling it from an old machine would be cheaper.

[sm0ky2]

@posting


I'm not sure if simply rotating a magnet in its own field will work
Most magnets ARE electrically conductive.


So why use a separate disk conductor at all?
someone would/should have noticed if it worked without the disk.
we would just draw current off the magnet.