Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Witness the Free Energy effect

Started by Theoretical Research, April 16, 2017, 05:16:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

vasik041

Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 16, 2017, 05:16:47 PM
According to the standard model, applying ac voltage to the cap should NOT produce a voltage on the cores winding, but it does exist.

According to "standard model" there is magnetic field inside capacitor with all the following consequences...

http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy122/Lecture_Notes/Chapter35/chapter35.html


Zephir

QuoteAccording to "standard model" there is magnetic field inside capacitor with all the following consequences

I also got into the same conclusion: even if the core would be completely nonconductive, some stray AC current should be detectable around capacitor, i.e. around ferrite. Even without theory of some displacement current and similar stuffs - because: why it shouldn't be? The plates of capacitor serve as a dipole antenna spreading oscillating EM field between them. Why this field couldn't be detectable with common coil detector at every place of volume between capacitor plates?

Therefore the stray capacitive AC current should be detectable with coil even without any current leaking through ferrite. This doesn't mean, that @Technical_Research couldn't be on something - but the inductive source of output voltage should be definitely subtracted from results in his experiment.

ARMCORTEX

Zephir you came to no conclusion.

You dont even understand differential equations, nor do you have a single overunity design to your name.

You are gonna talk on this forum for the next 10 years I know it.

Vortex1

The coil windings in TR's device are 90 degrees different than shown in the  drawing just posted by Zephir reply #36.

In other words, the coil is not between the capacitor plates, but forms a loop that encompasses the capacitor plates.

So just turn the coil in that drawing 90 degrees.

Regards

Zephir

@Armcortex: I see, A) how long you're posting here and B) which overunity design do you have (link)?

Quote from: Vortex1The coil windings are 90 degrees different than shown in the  drawing just posted.

You're perfectly right, the coil perpendicular to plane of capacitor plates would capture only subtle tensor component of passing capacitive current. Sorry for misinterpretation of geometry of @Technical_Research's device.

The existence of the displacement current component is indisputable, but it cannot have large practical meaning here - we all know, that the output signal from ferrite coil based radio ceases to zero, once we keep its wrong orientation with respect to transceiver. So that once we measure substantial signal under such a situation, then something would be wrong with our interpretation of Maxwell's equations. What @Technical_Research is saying in essence is, his ferrite not only detects radio-signal during wrong orientation with respect to transceiver, but it is even able to achieve overunity during it.

One explanation of this controversy could be just the Floyd Sweet (1, 2, 3) and Manelas effect, which I mentioned above. At high intensities of electric field the magnetic domains within ferromagnetic materials can be reoriented in similar way, like with passing magnetic field (which is opposite of ferroelectric effect in essence). What Floyd/Manelas is saying, with proper electric pulse the magnetic domains within block of ferrite could be reoriented in such a metastable way, they will create a new Bloch wall boundary within their volume and structured magnetic field capable to levitate magnetic bodies around it (between others).

In my theory the overunity may follow from metastable reorientation of ferromagnetic domains (analogy of negentropic phenomena like the undercooling or overheating). The return of magnetic domains into their equilibrial state can be assisted with vacuum/thermal fluctuations of the material, which would exert an usable work in this way. These non-equilibrial negentropic phenomena (which are all around us) can therefore serve as a key for practical utilization of overunity in analogous way, like the equilibrial phenomena are already utilized for entropic transitions and conversion of energy in accordance to thermodynamics laws (Carnot cycle for example).

The metastability of magnetic domains can be observed easily as so-called magnetic hysteresis, magnetic delay (viscosity) and Barkhaussen noise effects. During changes of magnetic field the magnetic domains of ferromagnets don't follow the changes of magnetic field smoothly, but they reorient itself just after while in step-wise manner - these jumps in magnetization can be detected with coil wound around material. In my theory just the moments during which the magnetic domains "wait" for their reorientation under tension can be utilized for conversion of heat into electric energy against II. law of thermodynamics and into drawing "free energy" from it.

If this theory is correct, then we should detect the Barkhaussen noise from ferrite rods not only during their magnetization, but also during its polarization within electric field in similar way, which @Technical_Research is using. Sweet recommends the usage of barium ferrite for it, which is more conductive than the common ferrites used today.