Re: Inventors and replicators - social aspects of overunity community

[Dog-One]

That response literally made me LOL.

Yes, Nelson has a very sporting sense of humor.  It would be a hoot to live next door
to him.

Me and my "berserk mode", what have I created...?

[Vortex1]

Are you in "berserk" mode ? seems so .

The answer to that is positively "yes"! Monty Python style 

I think all that "radiant energy" is affecting me.

Dog-One..... so it was you who created the "berserk" mode description!  I like that. In over 55 years of watching waveforms on a scope there is not a more fitting description for what we sometimes see.

[Vortex1]

Dear Vortex1.

A great deal has gone on since I turned in last night.

With respect, Nelson has never claimed his Mini Radiant Exciter was an OU device, merely a " tool " for exploration into this very Grey area.

I can understand your frustration as electronics was your discipline, you see nothing more than an elaborate Blocking Oscillator. My background is more mechanical in nature with a poor grounding in electronics, I was intrigued by Nelson's video presentation and decided, at the time, to look a little deeper.

Three devices were built, different cores used, and we all saw different results. Not having the knowledge ( me ) the project was shelved. I decided recently to open up a thread in order to have some of the unusual, to me, operation waveforms explained by the more knowledgeable.

Sadly the whole affair has gone rather badly so I would personally like to apologise to Nelson for any distress I may have caused him.

Kind regards, Graham.

Dear Graham

The person in question has some nearly sixty videos on youtube dating back 3 or 4 years to the present. Most are (to me) boring, bad camera work, and again, to me, show nothing of value, but that is only my opinion, to others they may be valuable.

Many have the term "Radiant" in the title, quite a few of them have "free energy" in the title or "free radiant energy" which is IMO "biasing" the viewer. "Overunity" is also used.

Many (not all) are being led to believe the so called "Mini Exciter" is but a stepping stone, master this and then move on to the real "free energy" stuff.

Lighting a neon bulb takes microwatts of power. So what is the claim for the circuit?

Charging a capacitor with one wire? No such thing, there is always another wire, it is the capacitance in the air that leads back to the circuit ground.

Developing funny waveforms on a scope? No, I think it's the undefinable, un-measurable, un-provable "radiant energy" term being bandied about again.

I only ask that claimants be held to the same standards in the electronic arena as if they were making claims for a new engine design and the truth of the situation will be evident i.e. a solid measurement protocol should be used but is nowhere evident.

IMO it couldn't hurt to use those standards as the template for vetting truth over fiction.

Kind Regards
Vortex1

P.S. IMO you need not apologize, you caused no harm. Perhaps when claimants (per the video titles) are misleading, they should feel some distress, after all, this is why most humans have a conscience.

[Jimboot]

Many are being led to believe the so called "Mini Exciter" is but a stepping stone, master this and then move on to the real "free energy" stuff.

I don't need a nanny mate 

[Vortex1]

I don't need a nanny mate 

I said many, Jim Boot, why did you assume I implied you were part of "many"?

"many" also implies "not all".

I was more referring to many of the hundreds of viewers of his videos.

Sorry that you took it personally.

regards