Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology

[Slider2732]

Itsu - Great news there and just waiting for the Doc to roll out whatever it is. I really do hope he has done all this before and it does work, so many questions would be answered. Matched TX's and RX's, abilities to tune, a battery source...if anything ever looked likely to emulate Tesla's experiments it would be Dr. Stiffler's work.

Gyula - my thinking for the Ring Modulator is that there could be 2 frequencies, the injected and the ambient mains. Some strange results can occur when a receiver with a Stiffler loop or even AV plug is near a mains cord, to a distance of 2ft away from it. Nothing needs to be connected to that cord on the other end, reception distance of wireless energy is dramatically increased on the same plane as the mains cord. But also, the FM type effects possible in situations like driving the Base of a Slayer exciter transistor with music from an MP3 player show non destructive frequency interactions. Plasma can be modulated to produce a speaker, without destroying the operation of the output. Radio uses 2 frequencies, is obviously highly effective at especially ShortWave for distances and hence was the mental link, correct or eroneous 

Partzman - that is stellar work and the positive OU's should be a focus. Perhaps it ties in to the new Stiffler direction, being that injection into the ground would be a logical method for the circuit output. In essence, a single wire, using the ground as the carrier wire.

All - However, i'm hoping he doesn't go off to a wide open field in the middle of nowhere land. The reason being that Stubblefield's telephone worked fine in the fields of Kentucky, but failed at his demo in New York. Own experiments work for several feet indoors through soil collected from outside, but don't work outdoors. A single wire amplified music signal can work to a couple of feet and yet a friend in Australia performed the same thing on a beach and attained 40 meters....I believe it would have attained similar distances if he'd measured in feet 
From what I know of Wardenclyffe tower, the reason for having to grab a hold of the earth and particularly to reach the water table on Long Island would be based on future proofing the system, as well as making it more effective around 1903. In 1900, Long Island was basically fields and nothingness, Shoreham wasn't incorporated until 1906..3 years after Marconi won the race for radio signals to cross the Atlantic.Tesla's location made sense, but ironically, the very success of his AC distribution systems would have gone on to limit the effectiveness of a system that had its grounding near the surface. Wires would have linked the houses and businesses for power, introducing a potentially serious problem for the tower operation. 
This is a quite fascinating interactive map of photo's, for how Shoreham looked by 1917, the year that the tower was pulled down. Wide open fields, lots of space, but the housing and infrastructure are now beginning to take place.
http://www.villageofshoreham.org/Shoreham_History/Interact_Map_Views/Interact_Map_views_40.htm
So, what Dr. Stiffler does with his ground and where the location will be is of major interest.

[Lidmotor]

All--- We are on the right track here but we may be reinventing the wheel.  I looked up this topic on Wikipedia and it goes into all the different methods used ---for wireless transmission of energy.  What Doc is about to do (I think) was done by an MIT team back in 2007.  They used an earth ground return path for the experiment and achieved 40% efficiency at 6.6 ft.  The frequency was 10MHz.  You will have to hunt for the description but it something Tesla was also working on long ago.  In 2008 a group called 'Nevada Lighting Company' did a similar experiment and increased the distance to 47ft using 60kHz.  They used the method 'resonant inductive coupling'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transfer

---- Lidmotor

[TinselKoala]

Tuned resonant inductive coupling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi-hl2W86yk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhBgAAJUPsw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5wbyAwgeO8

[gyulasun]

Hi Itsu,

I wonder why your setup peaks around 9 MHz when driven from the FG instead of the 13.5MHz the oscillator provides, the difference sounds too high at first.

Could it be due to the oscillator output being a high impedance source while the FG has the usual 50 Ohm low impedance output and the "shunting" effect of the latter via the overall stray capacitances of the 'enviroment'  (the lattice as the Doc would put it) can have such a high detuning behaviour? Well, maybe this is the case.
I assume that none of two L3 coils can be tuned individually by a small piece of ferrite rod to increase brightness any further, once the oscillator tank capacitor is set to the maximum light: this would insure the two L3 is in resonance around 13.5 MHz.
In case the coils would need tuning towards a little higher frequency, then try to use a piece of Alu or copper rod (say with a few mm OD and 10-15 mm long) because they will have the effect of increasing coil resonant frequency (versus the normal decreasing effect of a ferromagnetic core).
And if this same could be found for the case when the FG drives the two L3 coils, then my assumption would be correct, otherwise not.

Notice in the Doc's latest video the two L3 coils are placed far enough from each other length wise, your coils have parallel axis, this gives higher chance for mutual coupling than that the Doc's coils position. I mean there is a higher 'built-in detuning' possibility in your arrangement for the two coils (but this may not be a drawback).

Thanks for the video.

Gyula

[gyulasun]

Hi Slider,

Well, it is possible that the mains 50 or 60 Hz stray field 'sneaks' into the diode loop circuit with a certain amplitude, such stray field is certainly  present where ever a room or lab has mains wiring all around and in the walls. In this respect this frequency component has always been present in many of the tests the members have kindly showed in this thread so far and must have been so with the Doc's tests too. Yet, you all have found nothing special so far with the LED loop tests, as I am aware of and I believe that in this respect this would come from the negligible influence this mains leakage input may cause.

You mention some examples like FM type effects or plasma can be modulated to produce a speaker etc: these are okay to behave like that because they also work as mixers and you need to feed in a certain amplitude to manifest those effects. If you were to inject a few volts from a step down mains transformer to the diode loop via say some uF series capacitor, then it might already show some effect (say in the brightness) never seen in such diode loops if we may start speculating.
Thinking of a ring modulator as a mixer (because it is), the main two components of the mixing is the sum and difference of the two 'input' frequencies i.e. say the 13.56 MHz crystal and say the 60 Hz from the mains. So the sum and the difference is so close to the crystal frequency that the original 13.56 MHz component "rules" amplitude wise: the sum or difference frequency components do not or cannot have usefully higher amplitudes because the input stray field from the mains is very weak in itself (unless you deliberately feed in a few volts as I mentioned above).

Anyway, this is how I see this. If someone could ask dr Stiffler's opinion on this ring modulator explanation or operation in his setup, that would be at least one more opinion to chew on...   

Gyula