THE RANT ROOM

[onepower]

Interesting comments...

The only real fact is that this is the internet and recent studies found over 50% of what is posted is by bots,
shills and people with a vested interest. So what makes what two people post negatively any more
believable than anything else?. I could just as easily say I bought two of Holcomb's units and there
powering my house as we speak. It's not any more or less believable because nobody has any
demonstrable facts to prove what is actually true or not.

However strange behavior seems to be par for the course. Someone claims something with zero
proof, doubles down then finds it incredulous that everyone doesn't just believe them.
Here's a clue, just because someone supposedly finds something offensive and keeps
repeating themselves doesn't make what there saying any more believable.
Only real demonstrable facts can do that.

So a few critics making claims Holcomb is a scam is in fact no more believable than other people saying it isn't.

AC

[SolarLab]

How true, great observations.
Maybe soon we can get one (or build one) and test it out.

Maybe someone already did that and they just are't sayin...
yet, for whatever selfish reasons.

Makes for good drama, however   

[bistander]

Interesting comments...

...

So a few critics making claims Holcomb is a scam is in fact no more believable than other people saying it isn't.

AC

Holcomb makes the claim. An extraordinary claim. Burden of proof is on him. What he, or others, have offered for proof, or evidence, falls way short. Facts support critics being believable way more than supporters.

It would appear that he now has a $5million motivation to accept NASA's offer of independent verification. Put it to bed Dr. Rob Ray Holcomb.
bi

[dxer_87]

Best way to achieve success is to experiment and diy.

I do agree that simulators doesn't include overunity fact. The space and air have much energy in it and feeds all the compononent all the time - like we say etheric work of devices. Same is with kapanadze or hendershot coil, there is something in space which we aren't able to know by existing science.

i.e. a ferrit core adds energy into coil with current flowing and this can be much magnetic pressure with some types of ferromagetic available and the energy coefficient is inductivity. only there are no calculations for current gain. that's why any coil with high strong ferrite core and many turns shows overunity. once i've connected 8 of different coils on ferrite cores, set hypothethic input and output, started from a phase and i had overunity system to light up ccfl lamp (no gnd). other system was 10 different transformers (normal AC Step Down 50 Herz) connected by cables as the voltage raises. taken between grounding and neutral. the output was 220VAC several watts... yes, these parts are overunity, but overunity needs material. nowadays everything is miniaturized and included parts in electronics stuff or cars are useless for our purposes, the same is with speakers as a source. only few producers cares about energy in it because ppl don't know this and don't use it. we are lied by governments even if free electricity would be cool and normal systems available in stores, with services, shops and so on. and yes there is one answer why our generation need to diy, because the electricity grid was to important to hear what people do, what people think and so on. but this sucks if 2% observers want to control 98% of society. that's why those spy lines are used now by terrorists and mafias all over the world. just say too much... yes, we are prisoners of the system. to get off grid you would need several good diy books spread worldwide.

[SolarLab]

Holcomb makes the claim. An extraordinary claim. Burden of proof is on him. What he, or others, have offered for proof, or evidence, falls way short. Facts support critics being believable way more than supporters.

It would appear that he now has a $5million motivation to accept NASA's offer of independent verification. Put it to bed Dr. Rob Ray Holcomb.
bi

In case you missed this DNV-GL (now DNV) independant evaluation from the 13th and 14th of August 2019, attached.

There are others as well, as far as I understand - couldn't find anything on an offer from NASA to do
an independant verification however (maybe you could share that); could be tucked away somewhere.

TIA