Split Flux Transformer

[lancaIV]

Hi seaad, how are you  !
Conventional EE-technology : Maxwell-Ampere
For a n-p-n solarcell equivalent principle is for a motionless con-/ inverter the need of :
a. an electric emf circuit
b. a magnetic mmf circuit
and - logical- combinate each other !
The most known first industrial  trial has been by the Argentinian Subieta-Garron.Pre-industrial I would recognize the inventor Alexander Graham Bell as pioneer.
                                        -------------------------
To understand the internal emf and mmf streams I recomend to read ( with paper and pencil for notifications) the Keiichiro Asaoka publication related " static dynamo" based by conventional transformer technique :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=17&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990720&CC=US&NR=5926083A&KC=A#
How many different directions and how many streams in one/ two/... cores !?
The coils,  beginning with their turns : ccw or cw?  Combined - bifiliar- coils?

The coils ccw or cw turns orientation related to the core internal flow directions!?

The effect from an open circuit air gap and closed : in efficiency by power savings !?
Saturation point attention : cristalin or amorph dynamo-core. !? Frequency range  for power density. !?

-----------------------------------
Later this "easy seeming " Keiichiro device :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=JP&NR=2003009558A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=20030110&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

The EE-space and energy conversion potential is wide enough,  the device costs by Keiichiro view point :

Not " not expensive" , not  " inexpensive" but from " extremely inexpensive"  the inventor remarked !

-------------------------------------
For future power-densities look for Harold Goldbaum converter numbers, dependant from frequency :                                            " shoe-box dimension" :
https://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/entries/sustainable-technologies/3537

[seaad]

hi sead, i am talking about the one in the pics that you got 88 % ..
the output coils need to be close tight to the ferites,.

Ok understand. I'm going to do a test later but I'm not expecting much from a decreased diameter. I used 100 turns and vill test with 200 at the same freq next time an see if I can come close or above 100%.

A question to all;
Is this math formula relevant / valid for split flux transformers ??
Volt x Amp x Cos to phase angle = Input wattage  Real Power.

Stand by. Arne

[lancaIV]

Hi seaad, how are you  !
Conventional EE-technology : Maxwell-Ampere
For a n-p-n solarcell equivalent principle is for a motionless con-/ inverter the need of :
a. an electric emf circuit
b. a magnetic mmf circuit
and - logical- combinate each other !
The most known first industrial  trial has been by the Argentinian Subieta-Garron.Pre-industrial I would recognize the inventor Alexander Graham Bell as pioneer.
                                        -------------------------
To understand the internal emf and mmf streams I recomend to read ( with paper and pencil for notifications) the Keiichiro Asaoka publication related " static dynamo" based by conventional transformer technique :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=17&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990720&CC=US&NR=5926083A&KC=A#
How many different directions and how many streams in one/ two/... cores !?
The coils,  beginning with their turns : ccw or cw?  Combined - bifiliar- coils?

The coils ccw or cw turns orientation related to the core internal flow directions!?

The effect from an open circuit air gap and closed : in efficiency by power savings !?
Saturation point attention : cristalin or amorph dynamo-core. !? Frequency range  for power density. !?

-----------------------------------
Later this "easy seeming " Keiichiro device :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=JP&NR=2003009558A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=20030110&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

The EE-space and energy conversion potential is wide enough,  the device costs by Keiichiro view point :

Not " not expensive" , not  " inexpensive" but from " extremely inexpensive"  the inventor remarked !

-------------------------------------
For future power-densities look for Harold Goldbaum converter numbers, dependant from frequency :                                            " shoe-box dimension" :
https://contest.techbriefs.com/2013/entries/sustainable-technologies/3537

https://tesla3.com/hilden-brand-jack/

[seaad]

Hi LankaIV
Thanks for all of your many good but misplaced suggestions.
The topic of this thread is Split Flux Transformer. Your hint about the 5 leg transformer was good and right here. Thanks for that!
But as you now mentioned Jack Hildebrandt [ motor ] I can tell that I have conducted some experiments to  see if and how a Hildebrandt:s ON - OFF magnet control principle could be used as a prime mover in a split flux transformer / generator / induction situation. What I found so far is that his principle works great for devices that moves, as well as motors. Good when it comes to attract metals magetically.  But are not suitable at all in a transformer / generator,  concept. Thats my findings so far but they where only some quick tests and not deep enough. More testing must be done. So I can be wrong.

Regards Arne

[lancaIV]

Split Flux Transformer :
Split
Flux
Transformer

DC converter,"MEG", DC motor-DC generator ( independent: cw and ccw)

AC converter,"MEG",AC motor cw-AC alternator cw             

                        "MEG", AC motor ccw-AC alternator ccw
               
DC/AC inverter,"MEG",DC motor-AC alternator cw                         

                                       DC motor-AC alternator ccw


                 ergo converter/ inverter :: AC output : ccw or cw !? .... and ..... ?

                             Misplaced. ?

                            3 fluxes freedoms degrees : rotatory,  translatory,  linear                   

                           Rotative or as "MEG" or "MET"= motion-free transformer
                          "feedback" in an AC circuit ? Output cw or ccw and feedback input ?                                                                   

                            In an impulse DC or/ and impulse AC circuit ?
                           Winding turns right oriented ? Winding pulse turnings right oriented ?
                           AC sinus    positive 1/2 wave : ccw or cw and negative 1/2 wave : ccw or cw
                           AC sharp/ shark. ?