Tom van Keulen coil v9 setup free open source

[indigo22]

1st magnetic bias low voltage dc 2nd high voltage dc maybe opposite direction dunno right now ttrest it keep up the good work guys 

[indigo22]

 

[indigo22]

electronic workbench test 1

handy tool for testing 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXWRDVRthmQ&feature=youtu.be

[PARAV]

Yo Yo -Tom


Wow ! you are really going gang busters on this version 9.
I was just going to ask you a few hours ago to make up a schematic on it.
I am now going to abandon the version 2 and go ahead and work on this version 9 now as it sounds like it might be a more efficient set up.
I am going to rewind a new coil with the extra wire.
Now comes  a few questions.


Is the trigger wire still around # 26 gauge. and the other  turns of wire are around # 24 gauge or larger?
I am not sure about where the 160 volts dc comes from or goes to..  Is it a separate power supply?
Is that blocking cap --that 1 farad one in the video??
Are the 2 diodes ultra fast switching diodes?? or do they need to be ?


Thanx again for the schematic.
Looking forward to seeing this through with you.


Paul

[citfta]

In post number 81 your schematic shows the blocking cap connected backwards.  Since it has polarity markings on it I assume it is an electrolytic cap.  When connected backwards they have very high leakage and can even explode.  You also have the diode connected to the positive post of the battery backwards.  With the leakage of the cap and the backwards diode you are charging the battery from the 160 volts DC power source.  You are in danger of overcharging the battery and or exploding it also.

You are claiming OU based on your video evidence.  However there is not nearly enough information in your videos to determine if that is true or not.  I am NOT saying you don't have OU.  I AM saying there is no way to know from your videos.  They are made in a room so dark you can't see any of the wiring or connections.  You have all those other lights in the background only adding confusion to the video.  You claim you are pulsing it with 16 volts at 0.05 amps.  And you claim you are lighting a 220 volt bulb with 0.06  amps.  The problem is you are not showing anything about how much power is being supplied by your "bias" supply.  I am willing to keep an open mind about your claims but so far your evidence is very weak.

One last comment.  If you want to be taken seriously you need to make better drawings.  There is a free circuit drawing program called TinyCAd.  It is very easy to learn and will make your drawings look much more professional.  I use it regularly.

You of course can take my comments any way you want to, but they are meant to be helpful and maybe guide you a little in your efforts.

Respectfully,
Carroll