Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Gear pump and magnets

Started by Low-Q, September 08, 2017, 06:01:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lancaIV

                               permanent magnet /electro magnetic B/EMF

translation option in the espacenet-site included :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=3900890A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19900719&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP


Bei der Belastung der Lastspule tritt nach der Lenzschen Regel eine der Drehrichtung des Rotors entgegenwirkende Kraft auf. Diese auf den Rotor wirkende Bremskraft wird aber durch zwei Umstände stark in ihrer Wirkung eingeschränkt: 1) Es ist bekannt, dass der Kraftaufwand von zwei aufeinander wirkenden Magneten sehr viel geringer ist, wenn die Magnete seitlich zueinander verschoben anstatt abgerissen werden. Diesen Umstand macht sich der mechanische ferromagnetische Energiewandler zunutze. [/size]2) Im vorliegenden Fall werden nicht zwei aufeinander wirkende Magnete getrennt, sondern der bestehende Magnetfluss wird vom einen Jochschenkel zum anderen verlagert, ohne unterbrochen zu werden. Als nicht dargestellte Alternative können auch anstelle der Dauermagnete gleichstromgespeiste Elektromagnete verwendet werden. Dies ist deshalb möglich, weil mit hohen Windungszahlen der Magnetspulen und niedrigen Spannungen sehr starke Magnetfelder erzeugt werden können, die dann in der Form des oben beschriebenen Energiewandlers grosse Mengen magnetischer Energie nutzbar machen.


http://overunity.com/17432/athena-generator-construction-and-instructions/msg510555/#new
2.nd video  :             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kl5xqeA20Y
                                                             efficiency number ?


                                  ::) Try to lift a 1 ton car 10cm straight up. You can't. ::)   
                    You ever heared about someone named "Archimedes" and his lifting device ?
                                                  Zug- versus Hub- Kraft

profitis

"Try to lift a 1 ton car 10cm
straight up. You can't."

Hahaha think horizontal lanca

Low-Q

My point is, to be clear; you have more length, rotary or linear to counterforce the slidig magnet.
If you plot a graph for both cases, sliding and facing. Then find the area inside the curve over and under the center line.


This area is the product of force and displacement.


You will be surprised that the area in both graphs match perfectly.


Archimedes lifting device makes it manageable to lift water by doing it along a slope instead of lifting it up vertically. Except that his first built "screws" suffered from lots of friction (I have tested a poor replica in Denmark this summer), the applied potetial energy in the water is exactly the same.


This applies to the magnets as well. Sliding the magnet applies a potential energy that is equal to the applied potential energy when facing the magnet.


So the erergy output cannot be higher than the input.


Vidar

lancaIV

                       "....... match perfectly."
     
              ccw screw          shaft     cw screw
                    hurrikan       Auge         hurrican

http://www.pesquisa-unificada.com/pesquisas/vortex/
                      Kreis-Aussen-Flaeche

the difference between an 1m-10m-100m rotor in windparks?
                          a        rpm x sqm
                          b        rpm x d
                          c        rpm x U

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19860619&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=3602039A1&KC=A1&ND=4#

Low-Q

I have done some more experiments with the magnetic gear assambly.
The magnets around the outer gear are further away now.
Easier to rotate it together with the inner gear.


I can honestly say that there is still much friction, but much less. However, I can turn the rotors with a ceramic screwdriver inside the open pockets between the rotors.
I can easily feel that more force is required to turn the rotors ccw than cw direction.
When I flip the magnet which magnetize the inner rotor, I must apply more force in the other direction. In other words, it corresponds to what I expect from the design.


That said, I'm not 100% sure if the rotors some how have more friction one way than the other, depending on polarity of the inner rotor. So now I have printed out a crank that is glued on the outer rotor. I will do the same with the inner rotor.


It remains some more test before I can confirm the final results.


Attached picture was taken during the making of the new gear frame with magnet compartments.


Vidar.