Gear pump and magnets

[Low-Q]

Thanks for informative post. I thaught for a second that you was a spam-robot or something
This quote looks (for me) more like a conversation than the other posts


Well, I have made it some what clear, that I do this impossible experiments to learn.
Magnets are conservative, but when an idea pops up, I need to build it to understand where the problems are hidden.
I find it very inspireing, educational to do so.


You're absolutely welcome to reply, but your topics about radios, biology or whatever, was just confusing, and it looked like nonsense to bias my topic into something different.


I have a couple more ideas to post and learn from. I think it is worth the time showing others my own experience.


Vidar

citfa,it is cause to get faith, to get trust
cause it is based by knowledge of highest degree(academics of science) and based by experience threw experiments and their repeat to become
physical and technical standart.

Did you read "Reply 7" ?: ignorance of basics and fundamentals of magnets their orientation and effect
Posts: 2466 not really a "newbie"

First construction then thinking about it ?

Or: learning by doing - it: at first virtual(simulation) prototype
                                      -seconds real prototype

Why do you not correct him by false understanding about the matter ?  f.e."magnets are conservativ-e"

Do you want that the forum-members and guests will stay in
"stone-age"-science-levelling ?

Finally: Low-Q has the wright right to correct me about wrong statements,your reply,from physics and technics standpoint is worthless ergo: for future progression "non grata" !

My links:
                Gear pump and magnets Board: mechanic

Contribution to F=BIL like to find in industrial permanent magnets
                                  or bimetals
             and perpetal/permanent free energy motion devices
             as new concept or commercial product

           scientifical consense instead members nosense

Sincerely
             OCWL

p.s.:                   II.
                                 Low-Q
I will leaving now your thread/theme but this points above are clearly for all threads and themes guilty and finally: Nobel-award,"asymmetry(is perfection,no end=endless)

https://www.google.pt/search?q=f%3Dbil&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=zoW4Wd3QJOas8weM0ragCQ

https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=f%3Dbil+in+permant+magnets&nfpr=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiUi62H_qDWAhVCaxQKHZycB58QvgUIIygB&biw=640&bih=894&dpr=1.25

[lancaIV]

             Conversation about success and fail of i(m)-/material objects needs the strict https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditioning
                            without the misuse of strictly "physics Terms- and Termination" in inflated vulgar= non conditionized manner
                                                        =personal definition without geral -professional(expertise:q.e.d.)-consense world-wide
                           

                                       overall theme:  gear pump and magnets Board : mechanic
                                       or                  :  Low-Q gear pump and magnet attempt

                               
                                      "magnets are conservative": magnets are a piece of material with a physical effect
                                     this physical effect is relatively - distance (to other non-/ferrit material)dependant-  time-constant (effect decay)     
                                     and material either ambiental temperature dependant   

                                    magnets to magnets positioning in a shaft wheel for "perpetuum motion" is one trial,
                                    to get out worthfull work gain the next,
                                    more expensive the prototyping phase and later the propably selling phase of the only-magnets device 
                                   in relationship to variable em/pm-concepts (who will/shall pay the R&D investment ?)

                                   only permanent magnets:
                                   maximal precision degree (magnets producer : up to 4000 different shapes,forms,effect orientation, et cet ...)

                                   small charge production costs (up to 10000% more expensive than mass production)
                                   = minimal construction freedom-e about time-/finance-budget
                                   handicap: fixed rotation- fixed output - fixed transmission gear

                                   altruistic device for the "museum of eco-nomical hoaxes" (german: personal "Liebhaberei")

                                   espacenet is the international archiv-e for thousands of such appointed/applied trials,success/fail independant
                                                                          un-(deemed to withdrawn)/granted
                                   https://worldwide.espacenet.com/advancedSearch?locale=en_EP
                                   entering with "magnet motor"

                                  nice "thermovoltaic/thermalnoise measuring instrument"   https://av.tib.eu/media/10881 for em and pm magnets

[Low-Q]

I will probably never succeed, and the prototype cost is next to zero


Vidar

[lancaIV]

Your experience and living costs up to date not including ,your time spent ,the 3D-print machine costs and R.O.I. not calculating ,
using by near hand materials  et cet ....

                           The NASA spent more than 1 Mio. Dollar for orbital-ink,the Sowjets took a lead-pencil: ingenious ?

[Low-Q]

LOL