Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[tinman]

So,the energizer uses two effect to achieve the !claimed! self running machine.

1-the magneto is designed so as it is a high output,low drag generator.

This is achieved in two ways.
1-all the magnets poles have the same pole interacting with all the coils at the same time.
All coils are wound in the same direction,and are half wave rectified,so as current is drawn from the coils as the magnets are leaving the cores of the coils.
The claimed advantage to this is -the magnets can be pulled toward the cores without a magnetic field being produced by the coils,hat would push against the approaching magnets.
This !apparently! added mechanical energy to the system that is not provided by the motor.
Each coil also had a capacitor of the correct value placed across it,to form a tank circuit between coil and cap.

Second effect.

Lead acid batteries must be used in this device.
By pulse charging a LAB with high current pulses,it is claimed that both a magnetic and chemical reaction in the battery would offset any current drawn from the battery by the motor by more than 100%.
It is claimed that the ions in the battery are accelerated to a higher velocity by the high current pulses,than that of what the current draw by the motor would achieve.
The ions are of course flowing in the opposite direction during the high current pulses,to that of the direction they flow during motor on time,which causes the battery to charge at a higher rate than it is being discharged.

These are the claims by the inventer.

There will be those that think they know better,but they will also be the same people that have nothing to offer them self.


Brad

[Magluvin]

There will be those that think they know better,but they will also be the same people that have nothing to offer them self.


Brad

Common Brad. Is poking jabs the intention of this post?  I mean like in the beginning you were so sure that the washing machine motor was a better bet. And you were claiming that the windings in the first depiction had rectifiers on the coils..  Gees man. ER is not in this thread any longer because you could not take the criticism that may have been a bit deserved, maybe?

So maybe we all just chill a bit.. 

Mags

[Magluvin]

I think you will be pleasantly surprised at some point in the future as to how much ER really does know about this stuff.

I will not elaborate more, but just chill on it a bit and look deeper. You just may see there are more things to this than are seemingly apparent. Im betting on it. Big time.

Mags

[tinman]

Common Brad. Is poking jabs the intention of this post?  I mean like in the beginning you were so sure that the washing machine motor was a better bet. And you were claiming that the windings in the first depiction had rectifiers on the coils..  Gees man. ER is not in this thread any longer because you could not take the criticism that may have been a bit deserved, maybe?

So maybe we all just chill a bit..  d

Mags

After years of experimenting,i bet my left nut that the washing machine motor would make a far more efficient generator than that which Bedini used in his energizer.

If you wish to follow the nothingness that many here have,be my guest.

Regardless of what you think he may think he knows,i will be building the energizer to the specs stated by the inventer him self.

I think-like all those before you,you will be sadly dissapointed as to how much you !dont! get from Erfinder.

While he continues to put me down-as in your new thread,he will get the same back from me-end of story.


Brad

[Magluvin]

After years of experimenting,i bet my left nut that the washing machine motor would make a far more efficient generator than that which Bedini used in his energizer.

If you wish to follow the nothingness that many here have,be my guest.

Regardless of what you think he may think he knows,i will be building the energizer to the specs stated by the inventer him self.

I think-like all those before you,you will be sadly dissapointed as to how much you !dont! get from Erfinder.

While he continues to put me down-as in your new thread,he will get the same back from me-end of story.


Brad

Lol   Dang.  Left nut aye?   ok and alrighty then.... How about this.....

You keep your nut and if someone shows that you are way off base with all of your statements above, that you leave this forum for good if it happens? Is that a bet you will take to heart and keep your nutsack intact??    Not that I would like to see that happen really , but Im just wondering if that is how serious you are with your statements.  Is that a bet you are willing to make for real?

For me on all this, as I have said with TK that with soo much negative bias, and even more so by you here, Im thinking you are just putting it all together here for nothing. If you are so against the possibilities, why go through all the trouble to prove what you claim has been proven again and again that there is nothing good to find here? Why choose to even rehash it all? There doesnt seem to be even an inkling of possibility at all coming from you. Thats too bad.

So do you accept the new bet and keep your nuts?

Mags