Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[AlienGrey]

Brad what you are saying is interesting not every one can develop a device from beginning to end and some guys other than your self are manager potential that's OK but this team don't need managers as we are not being paid or funded 

Forum Devotees
Some of the other forums don't know if you have noticed have ether a tram running on tram lines going an outer circle route or a rag and bone man with a blinkered horse doing the same thing but slower asking for any more circuits but the author get the same treatment.

So who will develop a device get it going on his own create his own thread publish it and give it away only to realize he has blown his own security and some other thread devotee doesn't like any humor you slip in and now has the world banging at his door with laymen can't be bothered to build it or fix it ect ect.

Allen

[Void]

It comes from JBs 1984 book,that is about this device,along with information referred by John from other papers.
Below is a couple of pics with JB and his actual energizers from the early 80's.
As you can see,it is nothing like the one in the schematic posted on this thread.
That schematic was one JB drew up for Jim Watson.
Jim made a few of his own changes,and that is the energizer Jim displayed at the International Tesla conference in Colorado Springs.
If you want to know a more indepth description of this high current pulse charging of lead acid batteries,then here is the link below.
Where as i gave a very basic description of this battery charging effect,this page go's more in depth to what is actually happening !apparently!.
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/battery%20poppers.htm
Brad

Hi Brad. I had already read both JB's 1984 book and the info on Tom Bearden's site you referenced.
That's why I commented previously here that at least some of the claimed OU effect is supposed to be related to pulsing the battery
and some supposed effect of resonating the ion movement with the 'vacuum energy' or something like that, based on Tom Bearden's
theories. I was surprised that you said John's own 1984 setup described in his booklet didn't have a separate flywheel, as the picture
included in that JB 1984 booklet shows what appears to be a separate flywheel on JB's device. John experimented with a lot of different
setups, and many of his other setups didn't have a separate flywheel. It may not matter if the flywheel is separate
or part of the energizer rotor, if the energizer rotor has enough mass on its own to double as a flywheel.

I'll be interested to see how your JB 1984 device replication attempt performs.
All you can do is replicate as close as you can figure it was built by JB with the info that
is available.  John has mentioned using welding rods to make the soft iron cores in the past, so soft iron
wire or soft iron rod may work about the same. A person has to be practical in part choices otherwise they
may never be able to make any replication attempt. It sounds like what you are constructing should be
reasonably close to what JB did in his 1984 device based on the info that is available.

All the best...

[AlienGrey]

Yes John Badini RIP a very clever man one device he disclosed built and gave away and published goes unnoticed by
many but could change many lives if it was really developed and exploited.

Allen

[shylo]

get away from batteries, Their a waste of time and resources.
The spike won't run the system, it will help.
The only thing that will make it free , is if we use wind and solar.
But keep dreaming.
art v

[Void]

Yes John Badini RIP a very clever man one device he disclosed built and gave away and published goes unnoticed by
many but could change many lives if it was really developed and exploited.
Allen

Why not simply state which specific device you are referring to then?