Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[tinman]

Hi Brad. Yeah, maintaining LC resonance puts more load on the driving part of the circuit, in normal
circumstances anyway.  To see an OU energy gain something very out of the ordinary will have to be
happening somewhere.

I have been running tests on battery pulsing in various ways to see if I could find any unusual
battery charging effect like Tom Bearden has theorized about, but so far I have not found anything
that looks really unusual. The alternate pulsing of the motor drive and cap discharge with the use of a
sizable flywheel to keep the generator spinning up to speed during the cap discharge pulse window
is one possible source for getting an unusual gain, but of course you have to be able to get the cap bank to charge up
to at least 2 or 3 volts above the battery terminal voltage in a suitable amount of time first before trying the alternate pulsing,
which is where you seem to be having an issue.

The problem with trying to replicate other people's setups is most people who claim and demonstrate OU devices typically do
not provide enough specific details to do a proper replication. I am skeptical of John Bedini's claims because, that I know of, it seems
he never demonstrated anything publicly that really convincingly looked like over unity. As most people no doubt realize, doing relatively
short demonstrations when powering with batteries can potentially be very misleading.  When powering with batteries you have to do relatively
long test runs to see how the battery can really hold up, but this of course depends on the capacity of the battery you are testing with.
I try to keep an open mind however. Maybe there is something unusual hiding in Bedini's setups.

All the best...

Hi Void.

I do not believe this energizer will yield  any positive results.
The first red flag was the use of soft iron cores-way to much loss to eddy current heating--this is why we shifted to laminated cores.

I think your approach,the solid state DUT,would be a much more efficient way to go.

But,as i spent the time building the energizer,i might as well keep at it for a bit.
But at the same time,i am going to finish my larger setup,that uses a far more efficient generator.


Brad

[wattsup]

@tinman

Scope ch1 and ch2 on two non connected or tanked coils to see their phase difference if any. Then compare to the others. Then scope two in series and compare with two others in series.

Wattsup

[Grumage]

Hello All.

It seems I may have had my " wires crossed " in video 2!!   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9OblryAjrk

Observations?

Cheers Graham.

[Void]

Hi Grum. Interesting that the motor speeds up a bit when you connect the
cap output through the commutator pulser to the battery.

What is the frequency of your energizer output? Is it in the 180 Hz to 200 Hz range?

Are you alternating the pulsing to the motor and cap discharge so that when the motor is
powered the cap discharge is off, and when the cap discharge to the battery is on, the power to the motor
is cut off?

The commutator switch for the cap discharge pulse should be between the capacitor and the battery,
so that the capacitor is charging up when the motor is getting power, and then when the motor power is
cut off, the commutator connects the charged capacitor to the battery to discharge the cap into the battery in
a sharp high current discharge pulse. Is that how you have it? It would be nice to see a scope trace of the
voltage across the capacitor as well as the energizer output waveform, if possible. 

All the best...

[Grumage]

Hi Void.

Yes is the answer to your first two questions.

My capacitor is across the coils to create a resonant condition before the FWBR, I'm dumping from the FWBR back to the battery.

I can do a follow up tomorrow with your suggestions plus any others, if anyone is interested.

Cheers Graham.