Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

AlienGrey

Tinsel, if it's any help Donald Smith's original device he was selling, I've seen that device he was selling years ago the original 2 coils and an oscillator it was a Royer OSC assembly.

'Anyone' or his mate 'Someone' or 'Someone else' can make there own.  ;D ;D
AG

Vortex1

seaad asked:

QuoteVortex1 (all)
3) Does the the coupling factors or total energy transfer  be different  in this case maybe because we use a transmission (coupling) from
the coil part in a series resonance circuit (gen.)  to a parallel resonance circuit

  compared with (common radio)  parallel resonance circuit coupled to a parallel resonance circuit(s) ??

My guess is that they are equivalent

Regards Arne

You are correct, they are essentially equivalent. Because of the low output impedance of the signal generator current is basically injected into (by being in series with) the parallel resonant primary circuit.

In common radio tuning circuit, the parallel resonant circuit would provide an impedance match to the antenna and ground which uses to advantage the high impedance at resonance.

Regards

seaad

Instead of a gate gate driver it's possible to use an impedance transformer
I see some impedance mismatch at the secondary side too
see my suggestion

Regards Arne

itsu

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 02, 2019, 04:37:53 PM
Heh... at that frequency you are most probably operating in a pure EM mode, so you don't have to worry about "real HV". You may find that you can achieve "supernova mode" close coupling that does not result in a 1/r2 falloff with distance (to a certain limit.) Your receivers seem to be essentially the same as used in my system. The main difference is that I use coils of much lower inductance (and hence less power-wasting in ohmic resistance) and autoresonating drivers, in this case a Royer oscillator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x2YfA9LU5s

Hi TK,

yes i remember your experiments and the supernova mode.
Did you ever find out for sure what it caused?  (filament resonance?).

Itsu

itsu

Quote from: seaad on May 03, 2019, 05:22:21 AM
Instead of a gate gate driver it's possible to use an impedance transformer
I see some impedance mismatch at the secondary side too
see my suggestion

Regards Arne


Arne,    you draw a parallel circuit, but i am using a series resonance setup for both RX and TX.
Itsu