Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[a.king21]

The bulbs  Rick uses are 3 to 10 watt 12 volt mr16 led bulbs:


ie


https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=mr16&_sacat=0

[gyulasun]

a.king21,
Would like to ask whether the gate driver is driven with sine wave or square wave by the function generator?

[a.king21]

a.king21,
Would like to ask whether the gate driver is driven with sine wave or square wave by the function generator?

Square wave.

[forest]

Gyula
1. "  My idea at that time was that I would disturb the electrical equilibrium in the nearby portions of the earth, and the equilibrium being disturbed, this could then be utilized to bring into operation in any way some instrument" 

My understanding : my instrument should be able to disturb local Earth potential and make difference which can be utilized (power some other instruments) - the idea is to tap external energy
2. "I had already proved in my lecture at Columbia College that I could transmit energy through one wire; therefore, I was prepared to find that a current of considerable strength could be passed through this wire here [connecting the alternator to the elevated capacitor], although it was insulated. "
My understanding: the first part is utterly misleading (everybody thought he tried to move current inside the single wire ) but he is ONLY explaining that he can move charge in environment around because Earth is like single wire )of immense diameter) - the second part mach the previous text : "although it was insulated" - that part makes no sense if the charge is inside wire or insulated is elevated capacitor - because that is natural way to insulate electrical circuit to avoid looses.  So why he mentioned this ? Because he was about to move charges from the ground to the elevated capacitance or rather to the antenna. Energy from outside flow around the circuit - that's the only explanation I could find.
Now maybe I'm wrong, Tesla notes are very subtle and the real meaning seems deep hidden below the simple explanation, but after reading a lot some parts just start to do not match this simple explanation.

[gyulasun]

Hi a.king21,

Thanks for the answer. It was a blank question test whether you are willing to consider my posts at all because in the last couple of days you have avoided answers for my questions.

You wrote:

The importance of the gate driver:  The innovation by Rick is in the gate driver, because it causes a more disruptive discharge.  The disruptive discharge is  something which Tesla championed.  In this case it produces a larger magnetic field.
The difference is without the gate driver and  with the  frequency generator that has 20V PP you only get 250V PP on the transmitter coil, but 1300V with the gate driver @ 9V. So the gate driver dramatically increases the gains because of the fast rate of change.
This happens at  resonance of course, and you can see the increase on the scope shots.
The purpose of the disruptive discharge is to increase the rate of change. 

Well, the disruptive discharge is not correct to use here as an explanation for the increased (1300 V or higher) voltage level at resonance. 
It is okay that the output of the gate driver excites the series LC circuit with square wave, it can surely be considered as a very fast switch.
However, you (or Rick) forget to consider the teaching of the Tesla's patent "Coil for electromagnets". i.e. in plain English, in an LC circuit
the input current (having the same frequency as that of the resonant one of the LC circuit) finds no any resistance (to enter and flow) other than that of the wire resistance of the coil.  So there is no for instance the usual inductive "kick back" you find when pulsing a coil and when no resonance is involved.
But this fact would not provide a larger magnetic field (hence voltage increase) in itself, something else insures that. There is nothing fancy,  there is a normal explanation for that.
I would wait with the answer and leave to you to find it.

Gyula