2020

[Theoretical Research]

Hi Forest. Yes, as I have pointed out, if Kapanadze's devices are legit [snip]

Smh, 13 years he hasn't been able find an investor. He hasn't figured out that he can sell the devices without an investor by starting out small and reinvesting profits to buy more materials to make more, eventually hiring other people to make the devices. Nothing. Nothing but flawed logic. So he's afraid to take the device to a University and allow the scientists to take everything apart to verify it's not a fake, but yet he expects to sell millions of the devices? Did it occur to anyone that the act of selling the device means everyone can learn how to make the device?

I was told correct. It's a fake. All I see is a bunch of people at these forums who seem to have an invested interest in steering hobbyist in the wrong direction. Hm, go figure!

[Void]

There's a thing called being delusional.

Yes, I see evidence of this pretty much every day.

[sm0ky2]

Come on now. Not in this timeline.

Yes, in this timeline and every other.
It is irrefutable.
Say what you will, but the simple fact is
Your oil lamp sits above its fluid reservoir
Yet needs no oil pump


The wick-wheel continues to rotate forever.


Capillary action is OU.
The time masters cannot make that one go away

[Theoretical Research]

Yes, in this timeline and every other.
It is irrefutable.
Say what you will, but the simple fact is
Your oil lamp sits above its fluid reservoir
Yet needs no oil pump


The wick-wheel continues to rotate forever.


Capillary action is OU.
The time masters cannot make that one go away

Oh my. Could you & the void please do all of the poor PhD academics around the world a favor and finally once and for all let those poor scientists test your amazing devices that you so firmly believe to exist?

[sm0ky2]

The wick-wheel has a thread on this forum, it's been here for over a decade.
The instructable is simple. Water reservoir, capillaries, a wick to drip on the wheel
and of course a low mass wheel to spin from the dripping water, which returns to its reservoir.
It is easily replicatable in many designs, and the only argument so far to date is "evaporation"
Which we know how to prevent.
The ones that weren't made of paper, are still spinning.



Talking to the collegiate professors is of no use.
Any of them that are worth their title already know the truth.
And they are well aware of their schools relationship with the accreditation board.
They willingly lie to their students for a paycheck.