How We Should Approach And Proceed With Building Replications

[Magluvin]

Id Like to hear some views on this subject. So here is where we can discuss this.

I looked through the topics and dont know where to put it. Im not going to moderate here other than approving appropriate posts. If Stefan would like to make it its own board then thats cool too. I am not requesting to be a moderator if he does. Ill leave that up to him if he makes the changeover.

It would be good if many give their views to come to some sort of consensus on this. I dont have the ability to add a poll here. Ill look and see if I can do it after it is posted.

Mags

[citfta]

I voted yes.  A replication is not a replication if it is not built as closely as possible to the original.  Since NONE of us know everything we might be overlooking the one thing that makes the device work if we build it according to our ideas instead of like the original.  If built according to the original plans and it works like the original claims THEN we can consider ways to make it better.

I see the poll ends on my birthday.

Carroll

[Magluvin]

Hey Carrol

Thanks for posting.

I agree. 

Gota git to work.

I chose 60 days for the poll.  So countdown to your birthday begins today.

Mags

[profitis]

Replicate and extrapolate ek se

[antimony]

I voted yes, but it could be good to expand on replications after it has been shown to work properly.

It is sometimes hard to follow, as maybe not all components is on hand, but when people do a replication with different components then whats prescribed, it is not a bad thing, in my opinion.

I didnt read the posts before mine, so I may have just written the same thing as everybody else.