Massive Overunity Self Running claim with Unique Open Source system

[Void]

I would expect that big battery to run dead in about 2-3 hrs.

Maybe. Without careful measurements and lots of specific details provided, etc., it would
tend to still leave room for doubts. The point was that if it is really keeping the battery
charged up, then a continuous run of 24 hours or even a lot longer shouldn't be a problem,
and the battery should remain charged. Anyway, when someone shows a video claiming OU
and gives little or no details about how they are testing their setup, then I think that is a pretty big
warning sign, especially when their setup is powered with a fairly large capacity battery...

All the best...

[Hoppy]

I have seen situations whilst experimenting with Bedini energisers where feedback of inductive spikes to a battery (especially SLABS) can appear to charge the source battery for many minutes until the battery terminal voltage eventually stabilises and then begins to fall. This is due to a battery plate desulfation process and the apparent charging effect is increased with increasing load on the source battery. As previous comment, prolonged running times are essential to verify OU claims.

[sm0ky2]

In basic principle I have seen this  exact set-up before
In a high-tech lab, by someone making the same claims.
Two instances from the 1970's
One by Eric Laithwaite and another by an American magnetist.
his name escapes me, however I distinctly remember the use of
a 3-phase motor free running, and drawing power from the back end.
In the latter - experiments were involving a secondary field coil
which counteracted back-emf, further increasing power gain.


Both of these were only shown to me on video, so I have no hands on
experience with their set-up, but the amount of $ in both labs was
indicative of proper science. And their methods appeared to maintain
accurate measurement. To compound the issue, the second source also
had a dozen or so other devices, different in design, but also demonstrating
the same principles.


Namely - 3 and 6 phase inductive coupling, with a self-induced power gain.
Even after reactive power factors were accounted for.


I can't make a definitive assessment on this matter,
But at the same time I am not fully prepared to dismiss it as a hoax.


Drone motors and controllers are low-cost and readily available,
The ones used in this thread are high-power motors.
Used in commercial drones. (Construction, Hollywood, etc)
The drones themselves can cost tens of thousands of $$
However, the motors and electronic control units are cheap.


This shouldn't be difficult to test.


I DO recommend using a non-lithium rechargeable battery.
The charging requirements of a drone battery are not suitable
for this type of set-up, and will likely catch fire or otherwise be
destroyed by the charging/discharging process.

[e2matrix]

Thanks everyone for the comments and diagrams.   The one thing different this person is doing us making use of Solfeggio frequencies.    These unique frequencies might have something to do with his results - assuming they are overunity....   We'd have to hear from him to know which Solfeggio frequencies he is using, how they are being injected into his setup and at what power level.   I did send him a message through youtube but haven't heard anything back.   I'll try the email justawatt posted.  Email has been sent.